Frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice with spin quantum number s ≥ 1

被引:10
|
作者
Li, P. H. Y. [1 ]
Bishop, R. F. [1 ]
Campbell, C. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Phys & Astron, Schuster Bldg, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Phys & Astron, 116 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
GROUND-STATE; MAGNETIC-PROPERTIES; ELECTRON CORRELATIONS; ORDER; MODEL; PHASE;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/702/1/012001
中图分类号
O469 [凝聚态物理学];
学科分类号
070205 ;
摘要
The ground-state (GS) phase diagram of the frustrated spin-s J(1)-J(2)-J(3) Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice is studied using the coupled cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, for spin quantum numbers s = 1, 3/2, 2, 5/2. The model has antiferromagnetic (AFM) nearest-neighbour, next-nearest-neighbour and next-next nearest-neighbour exchange couplings (with strength J(1) > 0, J(2) > 0 and J(3) > 0, respectively). We specifically study the case J(3) = J(2) = kappa J(1), in the range 0 < kappa < 1 of the frustration parameter, which includes the point of maximum classical (s -> infinity) frustration, viz., the classical critical point at kappa(c1) = 1/2, which separates the Neel phase for kappa < kappa(c1) and the collinear striped AFM phase for kappa > kappa(c)]. Results are presented for the GS energy, magnetic order parameter and plaquette valence-bond crystal (PVBC) susceptibility. For all spins s >= 3/2 we find a quantum phase diagram very similar to the classical one, with a direct first-order transition between the two collinear AFM states at a value kappa(c)(s) which is slightly greater than kappa(c1) [e.g., kappa(c)(3/2) approximate to 0.53(1)] and which approaches it monotonically as s -> infinity. By contrast, for the case s = 1 the transition is split into two such that the stable GS phases are one with Neel AFM order for kappa < kappa(c1), = 0.485(5) and one with striped AFM order for n > kappa(c2) = 0.528(5), just as in the case s = 1/2 (for which kappa(c1) approximate to 0.47 and kappa(c2) approximate to 0.60). For both the s = 1/2 and s = 1 models the transition at kappa(c2) appears to be of first-order type, while that at kappa(c1) appears to be continuous. However, whereas in the s = 1/2 case the intermediate phase appears to have PVBC order over the entire range kappa(c1) < kappa < kappa(c2), in the s = 1 case PVBC ordering either exists only over a very small part of the region or, more likely, is absent everywhere.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Field-tuned quantum renormalization of spin dynamics in the honeycomb lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet YbCl3
    Gabriele Sala
    Matthew B. Stone
    Gábor B. Halász
    Mark D. Lumsden
    Andrew F. May
    Daniel M. Pajerowski
    Seiko Ohira-Kawamura
    Koji Kaneko
    Daniel G. Mazzone
    Gediminas Simutis
    Jakob Lass
    Yasuyuki Kato
    Seung-Hwan Do
    Jiao Y. Y. Lin
    Andrew D. Christianson
    Communications Physics, 6
  • [32] Randomness-Induced Quantum Spin Liquid Behavior in the s=1/2 Random J1-J2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on the Honeycomb Lattice
    Uematsu, Kazuki
    Kawamura, Hikaru
    JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2017, 86 (04)
  • [33] Phase diagram of a frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: The J1-J2-J3 model
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Bishop, R. F.
    Farnell, D. J. J.
    Campbell, C. E.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2012, 86 (14):
  • [35] Theoretical Study of the Frustrated Ising Antiferromagnet on the Honeycomb Lattice
    Bobak, A.
    Lucivjansky, T.
    Zukovic, M.
    Borovsky, M.
    Balcerzak, T.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2017, 131 (04) : 636 - 638
  • [36] Tricritical behaviour of the frustrated Ising antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice
    Bobak, A.
    Lucivjansky, T.
    Zukovic, M.
    Borovsky, M.
    Balcerzak, T.
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2016, 380 (34) : 2693 - 2697
  • [37] Ripple State in the Frustrated Honeycomb-Lattice Antiferromagnet
    Shimokawa, Tokuro
    Kawamura, Hikaru
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2019, 123 (05)
  • [38] Phase transitions in the Ising antiferromagnet on the frustrated honeycomb lattice
    Schmidt, M.
    Godoy, P. F.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2021, 537
  • [39] Influence of quantum phase transition on spin transport in the quantum antiferromagnet in the honeycomb lattice
    Lima, L. S.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2017, 432 : 169 - 174
  • [40] Spin transport properties of anisotropic Heisenberg antiferromagnet on honeycomb lattice in the presence of magnetic field
    Farshad Azizi
    Hamed Rezania
    The European Physical Journal B, 2020, 93