Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery

被引:32
|
作者
Miles, Randy C. [1 ]
Baird, Grayson L. [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Paul [4 ]
Falomo, Eniola [5 ]
Dibble, Elizabeth H. [2 ,3 ]
Garg, Megha [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02141 USA
[2] Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[3] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
MEDICAL INFORMATION; HEALTH INFORMATION; INTERNET; CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; QUALITY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019182082
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate readability of websites that are commonly accessed for information on breast lesions requiring surgery. Materials and Methods: An internet search using three malignant and eight nonmalignant breast lesions that traditionally require lumpectomy or excisional biopsy as search terms was conducted to identify websites commonly accessed for patient information on breast lesions requiring surgery. Nine websites with information on breast diagnoses were identified based on search engine results for each breast lesion queried. Available patient-directed information was downloaded for each lesion from each website on May 15, 2018. Grade-level readability of downloaded content for each lesion was then determined by using generalized estimating equations, with observations nested within readability metrics from each website. Readability of associated terms breast biopsy, breast cancer, and breast surgery was also evaluated with the same method. Results were compared with American Medical Association (AMA) recommended readability parameters (sixth-grade reading level). All interval estimates were calculated for 95% confidence. Results: Average grade level readability score of health information on breast lesions requiring surgery was 11.7, which exceeded the AMA parameters. Information on Wikipedia was written at the highest reading level (grade level readability score, 14.2), while information on the National Institutes of Health website (http://cancer.gov) was written at the lowest reading level (grade level readability score, 9.7). Educational materials on malignant breast lesions (grade level readability score, 12.3) were written at a higher reading level than were those on nonmalignant breast lesions (grade level readability score, 11.4). Information on the terms breast biopsy (grade level readability score, 10.9), breast cancer (grade level readability score, 10.6), and breast surgery (grade level readability score, 11.1) were all written above a sixth-grade reading level. Conclusion: Readability of current online resources on breast biopsy lesions traditionally requiring surgery may be too complex for the general public to comprehend, leading to misinformation and confusion. (c) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Readability of Online Educational Materials for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome
    Kiapour, Ata M.
    Otoukesh, Babak
    Hosseinzadeh, Shayan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (11) : E548 - E554
  • [32] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [33] Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Branchial Cleft Cysts
    Daines, Benjamin S.
    Idicula, Winslo
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [34] The Birth of the Contextual Health Education Readability Score in an Examination of Online Influenza Patient Educational Materials
    Irfan, Bilal
    Yasin, Ihsaan
    Yaqoob, Aneela
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [35] Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials for Coronary Artery Calcium Scans and Implications for Health Disparities
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    Ngo, Summer
    Baird, Grayson
    Balla, Sujana
    Miles, Randy
    Garg, Megha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (18):
  • [36] Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards
    Lee, Kevin C.
    Berg, Elizabeth T.
    Jazayeri, Hossein E.
    Chuang, Sung-Kiang
    Eisig, Sidney B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (01) : 180.e1 - 180.e8
  • [37] A Readability Analysis of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Fibula Free Flap Surgery
    Sunkara, Pranit R.
    Powell, Lauren E.
    Quick, Joseph D.
    Stanek, Joel J.
    Mahajan, Ashish Y.
    [J]. PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024,
  • [38] READABILITY OF ARABIC VS ENGLISH PATIENT EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS
    Malik, Abdulaziz
    El-Haj, Mahmoud
    Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 : S320 - S321
  • [39] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Adam Timothy Lucy
    Stephanie L. Rakestraw
    Courtney Stringer
    Daniel Chu
    Jayleen Grams
    Richard Stahl
    Margaux N. Mustian
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6519 - 6525
  • [40] Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Arthroscopy-Related Online Patient Education Materials
    Akinleye, Sheriff D.
    Krochak, Ryan
    Richardson, Nicholas
    Garofolo, Garret
    Culbertson, Maya Deza
    Erez, Orry
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (04): : 1272 - 1279