Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery

被引:32
|
作者
Miles, Randy C. [1 ]
Baird, Grayson L. [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Paul [4 ]
Falomo, Eniola [5 ]
Dibble, Elizabeth H. [2 ,3 ]
Garg, Megha [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02141 USA
[2] Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[3] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
MEDICAL INFORMATION; HEALTH INFORMATION; INTERNET; CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; QUALITY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019182082
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate readability of websites that are commonly accessed for information on breast lesions requiring surgery. Materials and Methods: An internet search using three malignant and eight nonmalignant breast lesions that traditionally require lumpectomy or excisional biopsy as search terms was conducted to identify websites commonly accessed for patient information on breast lesions requiring surgery. Nine websites with information on breast diagnoses were identified based on search engine results for each breast lesion queried. Available patient-directed information was downloaded for each lesion from each website on May 15, 2018. Grade-level readability of downloaded content for each lesion was then determined by using generalized estimating equations, with observations nested within readability metrics from each website. Readability of associated terms breast biopsy, breast cancer, and breast surgery was also evaluated with the same method. Results were compared with American Medical Association (AMA) recommended readability parameters (sixth-grade reading level). All interval estimates were calculated for 95% confidence. Results: Average grade level readability score of health information on breast lesions requiring surgery was 11.7, which exceeded the AMA parameters. Information on Wikipedia was written at the highest reading level (grade level readability score, 14.2), while information on the National Institutes of Health website (http://cancer.gov) was written at the lowest reading level (grade level readability score, 9.7). Educational materials on malignant breast lesions (grade level readability score, 12.3) were written at a higher reading level than were those on nonmalignant breast lesions (grade level readability score, 11.4). Information on the terms breast biopsy (grade level readability score, 10.9), breast cancer (grade level readability score, 10.6), and breast surgery (grade level readability score, 11.1) were all written above a sixth-grade reading level. Conclusion: Readability of current online resources on breast biopsy lesions traditionally requiring surgery may be too complex for the general public to comprehend, leading to misinformation and confusion. (c) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lost in Translation: The Readability Discrepancy of Online Patient Educational Materials for PCL Surgery
    Lin, Kuan-Yu
    Wang, Rena G.
    Hassan, Saleh
    Zhang, Andi
    Kaar, Scott G.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2024, 12 (04): : 264 - 274
  • [2] READABILITY AND RELIABILITY OF ONLINE PATIENT EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS ON STATINS
    Asirvatham, Roshini
    Ngo, Summer
    Baird, Grayson
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 1762 - 1762
  • [3] THE READABILITY OF ONLINE CANADIAN RADIOTHERAPY PATIENT EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS
    Al Balushi, Mustafa
    Debenham, Brock
    Ghosh, Sunita
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 163 : S15 - S15
  • [4] The readability of online Canadian radiotherapy patient educational materials
    Al Balushi, Mustafa
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Debenham, Brock
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 51 (04) : 617 - 623
  • [5] Readability of online patient educational materials for transgender dermatologic care
    Yousif, Rame
    Zheng, David X.
    Chang, Irene A.
    Wong, Christina
    Trinidad, John
    Carr, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (04) : 922 - 924
  • [6] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR
    McEnteggart, Gregory E.
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Skierkowski, Dorothy
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ahn, Sun H.
    Soares, Gregory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 1164 - 1168
  • [7] Readability f Online Hand Surgery Patient Educational Materials: Evaluating the Trend Since 2008
    Zhang, Dafang
    Earp, Brandon E.
    Kilgallen, Elliott E.
    Blazar, Philip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (02): : 186.e1 - 186.e8
  • [8] ASO Author Reflections: The Readability of Patient-Facing Breast Cancer Surgery Educational Materials
    Rauzi, Anna
    Powell, Lauren E.
    White, Mckenzie
    Prathibha, Saranya
    Hui, Jane Yuet Ching
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (13) : 8111 - 8112
  • [9] ASO Author Reflections: The Readability of Patient-Facing Breast Cancer Surgery Educational Materials
    Anna Rauzi
    Lauren E. Powell
    McKenzie White
    Saranya Prathibha
    Jane Yuet Ching Hui
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 8111 - 8112
  • [10] The readability of online patient education materials on maxillomandibular advancement surgery
    Khan, Sofia
    Walters, Rameen K.
    Walker, Angelica M.
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Liu, Stanley Y.
    Tremont, Timothy J.
    Abdelwahab, Mohamed A.
    [J]. SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2024, 28 (02) : 745 - 751