A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRATHECAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND MIDAZOLAM AS AN ADJUVANT TO BUPIVACAINE FOR TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY

被引:0
|
作者
Vinod, C. N. [1 ]
Suraj, H. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] KIMS Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Bangalore 560004, Karnataka, India
关键词
Spinal Anaesthesia; Bupivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; HUMAN SPINAL-CORD; ANTINOCICEPTION; CLONIDINE; RECEPTORS;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2019/42
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha 2 adrenergic agonist and Midazolam, a benzodiazepine derivative both modulate spinal analgesia by different mechanisms. We compared Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as an adjuvant to hyperbaric Bupivacaine in subarachnoid blockade to evaluate the onset and duration of motor and sensory block, post-operative analgesia, hemodynamic changes and adverse effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, sixty female patients aged 18 - 65 years of ASA grade 1 and 2, randomly allocated into two groups (30 in each group), posted for total abdominal hysterectomy, were studied. Group D received 12.5 mg of hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine (10 mu g) in 1 ml of normal saline. Group M received 12.5 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Midazolam (2.5 mg) in 1 ml of normal saline. The two groups were compared with respect to onset of sensory and motor block, regression time of sensory and motor block, rescue analgesia, hemodynamic data and adverse effects. Sample size was taken for convenience. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 18.0 evaluation version) was used for the analysis to obtain the data and Microsoft Word, Excel have been used to generate graphs, tables, etc. Results on continuous measurement are presented on Mean +/- SD and continuous data is analysed. Significance is assessed at 5% level of significance. RESULTS Group D patients showed a significantly prolonged sensory and motor block than Group M patients. The sensory regression time to S1 was (324.67 +/- 27.26 min) in Group D and (254.00 +/- 20.44 min) in Group M. The time of motor block regression to reach Bromage 0 was (314.33 +/- 23.44 min) in Group D and (212.33 +/- 11.35 min) in Group M. Rescue analgesic time was significantly prolonged in Group D (419.33 +/- 21.80 min) as compared to Group M (271.33 +/- 30.14 min). CONCLUSION Dexmedetomidine (10 mcg) as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine in subarachnoid blockade is associated with longer sensory, motor block and longer duration of analgesia in comparison to Midazolam (2.5 mg) with a comparable incidence of side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 194
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF INTRAMUSCULAR DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND MIDAZOLAM PREMEDICATION FOR ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    ERKOLA, O
    KORTTILA, K
    AHO, M
    HAASIO, J
    AANTAA, R
    KALLIO, A
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1994, 79 (04): : 646 - 653
  • [22] Dexmedetomidine as an Intrathecal Adjuvant with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Randomized Double Blinded Case Control Study
    Joshi, Sapana
    Sriramamurthy, Kaja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2015, 3 (04) : 72 - 77
  • [23] Comparison of the Effects of Adding Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesia
    Samantaray, Aloka
    Hemanth, Natham
    Gunnampati, Karunakar
    Pasupuleti, Hemalatha
    Mukkara, Madhusudan
    Rao, Mangu Hanumantha
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [24] A study to compare the efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries
    Khare, Arvind
    Chohala, Mukesh
    Thada, Beena
    Mathur, Veena
    Garg, Deepak
    Tanwar, Neha
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [25] A study to compare the efficacy of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus nalbuphine as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries
    Arvind Khare
    Mukesh Chohala
    Beena Thada
    Veena Mathur
    Deepak Garg
    Neha Tanwar
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [26] Intraperitoneal tramadol and bupivacaine in total abdominal hysterectomy
    Memis, D
    Turan, A
    Karamanlioglu, B
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 22 (10) : 804 - 805
  • [27] Gasless laparoscopic hysterectomy: A comparative study with total abdominal hysterectomy
    Tintara, H
    Choobun, T
    Geater, A
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [28] Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A comparative study
    Vaisbuch, E
    Goldchmit, C
    Ofer, D
    Agmon, A
    Hagay, Z
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2006, 126 (02): : 234 - 238
  • [29] A comparative study between intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine with intrathecal bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries
    Yoganarasimha, N.
    Raghavendra, T. R.
    Amitha, S.
    Shridhar, K.
    Radha, M. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 58 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [30] Comparative Study of Post-operative Analgesia Using Epidural Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Versus Bupivacaine and Neostigmine in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
    Sathyamoorthy, Valli
    Karmegam, Gomathi
    Balasubramaniam, Sridharan
    Anandan, Heber
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (09) : 15 - 19