SCOTROC 2A: Carboplatin followed by docetaxel or docetaxel gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Vasey, PA
Atkinson, R
Osborne, R
Parkin, D
Symonds, R
Paul, J
Lewsley, L
Coleman, R
Reed, NS
Kaye, S
Rustin, GJS
机构
[1] Western Infirm & Associated Hosp, Beatson Oncol Ctr, CR UK Clin Trials Unit, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Belfast City Hosp, HSS Trust, Belfast BT9 7AB, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Poole Hosp NHS Trust, Dorset Canc Ctr, Poole BH15 2JB, Dorset, England
[4] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, Scotland
[5] Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirm, NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[6] Weston Pk Hosp NHS Trust, Sheffield S10 2SJ, S Yorkshire, England
[7] Royal Marsden Hosp, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[8] Mt Vernon Hosp, Northwood HA6 2RN, Middx, England
关键词
ovarian cancer; docetaxel; carboplatin; gemcitabine; triple-agent therapy; sequential therapy;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6602909
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The feasibility of sequential carboplatin followed by docetaxel-based therapy for untreated ovarian cancer was determined. Patients received four q3w cycles of carboplatin AUC 7, then four q3w cycles of either docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) (day 1) (arm A); docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 1250 mg m(-2) (days 1,8) (arm B) or docetaxel 25 mg m(-2) and gemcitabine 800 mg m(-2) (both given weekly (days 1,8,15)) (arm C). A total of 44 patients were randomised to each treatment arm. None of the arms demonstrated an eight cycle completion rate (70.5/72.7/45.5% in arms A/B/C, respectively), which was statistically greater than 60% (P = 0.102, P = 0.056, P = 0.982) which was our formal feasibility criteria, although only the completion rate in arm C was clearly worse than this level. The overall response rate (ORR) after carboplatin was 65.7% in 70 evaluable patients. In evaluable patients, ORRs after docetaxel-based cycles were: arm A 84.0% (21 out of 25); arm B 77.3% (17 out of 22); arm C 69.6% (16 out of 23). At follow-up (median 30 months), median progression-free survival times were: arm A 15.5 months (95% Cl: 10.5 - 20.6); arm B 18.1 months (95% Cl: 15.9 - 20.3); arm C, 13.7 months (95% Cl: 12.8 - 14.6). Neutropenia was the predominant grade 3 - 4 haematological toxicity: 77.8/85.7/54.4% in arms A/B/C, respectively. Dyspnoea was markedly increased in both gemcitabine-containing arms (P = 0.001) but was worse in arm C. Although just failing to rule out eight cycle completion rates less than 60%, within the statistical limitations of these small cohorts, the overall results for arms A and B are encouraging. Larger phase III studies are required to test these combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sequential gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer:: A phase II study
    Mäenpää, JU
    Grénman, SE
    Jalkanen, JT
    Kuoppala, TA
    Leminen, AO
    Puistola, US
    Vuolo-Merilä, PM
    Yliskoski, MH
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 101 (01) : 114 - 119
  • [42] A COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS COMPARING TWO SEQUENCES OF TREATMENT FOR FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY IN METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER (MCRPC): CABAZITAXEL FOLLOWED BY DOCETAXEL VERSUS DOCETAXEL FOLLOWED BY CABAZITAXEL
    Schwager, M.
    Fizazi, K.
    Zaghdoud, N.
    Delva, R.
    Mescam, Gravis G.
    Baciarello, G.
    Theodore, C.
    Goupil, Gross M.
    Bompas, E.
    Joly, F.
    Tazi, Y.
    L'Haridon, T.
    N'guyen, T.
    Barthelemy, P.
    Culine, S.
    Berdah, J.
    Deblock, M.
    Beuzedoc, P.
    Flechon, A.
    Cheneau, C.
    Martineau, G.
    Borget, I
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A444 - A444
  • [43] Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
    O'Shaughnessy, Joyce A.
    Pluenneke, Robert
    Sternberg, Jack
    Khandelwal, Pankaj
    Ilegbodu, Des
    Asmar, Lina
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2006, 6 (06) : 505 - 510
  • [45] Maintenance erlotinib (E) following first-line treatment with docetaxel, carboplatin and erlotinib in patients with ovarian carcinoma
    Vasey, P. A.
    Paul, J.
    Rustin, G.
    Wilson, R.
    Guastalla, J.
    Pujade-Lauraine, E.
    Gore, M.
    Gabra, H.
    Carty, K.
    Kaye, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [46] Docetaxel/gemcitabine or cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of a multicentre randomized phase II trial
    D. Binder
    H. Schweisfurth
    C. Grah
    C. Schäper
    B. Temmesfeld-Wollbrück
    G. Siebert
    N. Suttorp
    T. Beinert
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2007, 60 : 143 - 150
  • [47] Docetaxel/gemcitabine or cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC):: results of a multicentre randomized phase II trial
    Binder, D.
    Schweisfurth, H.
    Grah, C.
    Schaeper, C.
    Temmesfeld-Wollbrueck, B.
    Siebert, G.
    Suttorp, N.
    Beinert, T.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [48] Low neurotoxicity of chemotherapy with Carboplatin/Docetaxel for reccurent epithelial ovarian cancer
    Meyer, A
    Huober, J
    Goerner, R
    Grischke, EM
    Wagner, U
    Bastert, G
    Wallwiener, D
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S244 - S244
  • [49] Carboplatin (C) followed by sequential weekly paclitaxel (T) and gemcitabine (G) as first-line treatment for ovarian cancer.
    Perren, T
    Gore, M
    Hall, G
    Everard, M
    A'Hern, R
    Cole, C
    Gibbens, I
    Jenkins, A
    Kaye, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 : S58 - S58
  • [50] A phase II feasibility study of carboplatin followed by sequential weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment for ovarian cancer
    Harries, M
    Moss, C
    Perren, T
    Gore, M
    Hall, G
    Everard, M
    A'Hern, R
    Gibbens, I
    Jenkins, A
    Shah, R
    Cole, C
    Pizzada, O
    Kaye, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (04) : 627 - 632