Reassessment of the Access Testosterone chemiluminescence assay and comparison with LC-MS method

被引:19
|
作者
Dittadi, Ruggero [1 ]
Matteucci, Mara [2 ]
Meneghetti, Elisa [1 ]
Ndreu, Rudina [3 ]
机构
[1] ULSS 3 Serenissima, Osped Angelo, UOC Lab Anal, Lab Med Dept, Venice, Italy
[2] Eureka Srl, Lab Div, Chiaravalle, AN, Italy
[3] CNR Clin Physiol Inst, Pisa, Italy
关键词
cross-reaction; DxI platform; immunoassay method; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; LoQ; testosterone; IMMUNOASSAYS; MS/MS; SERUM;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.22286
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Aim of the studyTo reassess the imprecision and Limit of Quantitation, to evaluate the cross-reaction with dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), the accuracy toward liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and the reference interval of the Access Testosterone method, performed by DxI immunoassay platform (Beckman Coulter). Material and MethodsImprecision was evaluated testing six pool samples assayed in 20 different run using two reagents lots. The cross-reaction with DHEAS was studied both by a displacement curve and by spiking DHEAS standard in two serum samples with known amount of testosterone. The comparison with LC-MS was evaluated by Passing-Bablock analysis in 21 routine serum samples and 19 control samples from an External Quality Assurance (EQA) scheme. The reference interval was verified by an indirect estimation on 2445 male and 2838 female outpatients. ResultsThe imprecision study showed a coefficient of variation (CV) between 2.7% and 34.7% for serum pools from 16.3 and 0.27nmol/L. The value of Limit of Quantitation at 20% CV was 0.53nmol/L. The DHEAS showed a cross-reaction of 0.0074%. A comparison with LC-MS showed a trend toward a slight underestimation of immunoassay vs LC-MS (Passing-Bablock equations: DxI=-0.24+0.906 LCMS in serum samples and DxI=-0.299+0.981 LCMS in EQA samples). The verification of reference interval showed a 2.5th-97.5th percentile distribution of 6.6-24.3nmol/L for male over 14years and <0.5-2.78nmol/L for female subjects, in accord with the reference intervals reported by the manufacturer. ConclusionsThe Access Testosterone method could be considered an adequately reliable tool for the testosterone measurement.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization of the CYP inhibition assay using LC-MS/MS
    Abduraman, Muhammad Asyraf
    Mustafa, Nor Hidayah
    Yaacob, Nik Soriani
    Amanah, Azimah
    Tan, Mei Lan
    METHODSX, 2022, 9
  • [42] An LC-MS/MS assay for estimating conivaptan in human plasma
    Cui, Yanli
    Wu, Feng
    ACTA CHROMATOGRAPHICA, 2025,
  • [43] An LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of goserelin and testosterone in rat plasma for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies
    Zhang, Shu
    Han, Jiangbin
    Leng, Guangyi
    Di, Xin
    Sha, Chunjie
    Zhang, Xuemei
    Li, Youxin
    Liu, Wanhui
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2014, 965 : 183 - 189
  • [44] COMPARISON OF COAL TARS BY LC-MS
    HEROD, AA
    LADNER, WR
    STOKES, BJ
    BERRY, AJ
    GAMES, DE
    HOHN, M
    FUEL, 1987, 66 (07) : 935 - 946
  • [45] LC-MS/MS method assay for simultaneous determination of the pretomanid and pyrazinamide in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS: Assessment of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study
    Huang, Tao
    Wang, Li
    Wang, Fang
    Shen, Xin
    Wang, Libin
    ACTA CHROMATOGRAPHICA, 2024, 36 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [46] Method comparison study of the Elecsys® β-Amyloid (1-42) CSF assay versus comparator assays and LC-MS/MS
    Shaw, Leslie M.
    Hansson, Oskar
    Manuilova, Ekaterina
    Masters, Colin L.
    Doecke, James D.
    Li, Qiao-Xin
    Rutz, Sandra
    Widmann, Monika
    Leinenbach, Andreas
    Blennow, Kaj
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 72 : 7 - 14
  • [47] Method Development and Validation for the Purity Assay of Sn-ADAM by HPLC and LC-MS/MS
    Yang, H.
    Hsia, Y.
    Liu, K.
    Tsai, H.
    Chen, C.
    Lin, W.
    Shen, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 : S384 - S384
  • [48] Comparison of three quantification approaches for LC-MS/MS
    Lehotay, Steven J.
    Mastovska, Katerina
    Lightfield, Alan R.
    Gates, Robert A.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U226 - U227
  • [49] Novel LC-MS/MS method for plasma vancomycin: Comparison with immunoassays and clinical impact
    Oyaert, Matthijs
    Peersman, Nele
    Kieffer, Davy
    Deiteren, Kathleen
    Smits, Anne
    Allegaert, Karel
    Spriet, Isabel
    Van Eldere, Johan
    Verhaegen, Jan
    Vermeersch, Pieter
    Pauwels, Steven
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 441 : 63 - 70
  • [50] LC-MS analyses of microcystins in fish tissues overestimate toxin levels—critical comparison with LC-MS/MS
    J. Kohoutek
    O. Adamovský
    M. Oravec
    Z. Šimek
    M. Palíková
    R. Kopp
    L. Bláha
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2010, 398 : 1231 - 1237