Elective single embryo transfer - The Scandinavian experiment

被引:0
|
作者
Galeraud-Denis, I. [1 ]
Denoual-Ziad, C. [2 ]
Muris-Guiliou, C. [2 ]
Benhaim, A. [1 ]
Herlicoviez, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] CHU Caen, Ctr Assistance Med Procreat, Unite Biol, F-14033 Caen, France
[2] CHU Caen, Ctr Assistance Med Procreat, Unite Med Reprod, F-14033 Caen, France
来源
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE | 2008年 / 36卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART); Multiple birth; Single embryo transfer (eSET); Single versus two embryo transfer (SET versus DET);
D O I
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.07.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Limiting the number of embryos transferred from three to two does not reduce the high risk of twin pregnancy (between 21 and 40%). Scandinavian centers have proposed in the 2000s the elective single embryo transfer (eSET) as the only means to reduce maternal, neonatal and psychological consequences related to multiple births. Pooled results from prospective randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies comparing eSET and transfer of two embryos (DET) in a selected Population have confirmed the almost complete disappearance of twins when eSET was effective but the compromising effect of eSET upon live birth rates was discussed. Optimizing the eSET overall pregnancy rate need to associate a freezing policy and to define risk factors for increased chance of multiple birth (patient age, diagnosis, number of top-embryos or unsuccessful attempts). The extension of eSET practice to an unselected population irrespective of embryo quality is still controversial. The choice between offering one cycle of SET or DET in an unselected patient population depends on the society's willingness to optimize the in vitro fertilization results according to a defined health care policy: the first one is the twin,,, disappearance with reduced overall pregnancy rate and the second one is a reduced twin birth rate with maintain of the total pregnancy percentage. The real question is to define what percentage of twin pregnancy Could be considered as acceptable. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1150
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The irrational attraction of elective single-embryo transfer (eSET)
    Gleicher, Norbert
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (02) : 294 - 297
  • [42] The effective prevention of multiple pregnancies by elective single embryo transfer
    Komaba, R.
    Maeda, M.
    Sugawara, N.
    Araki, Y.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S154 - S154
  • [43] Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy: Is it really working?
    Goswami, M.
    Gibbins, S.
    Ahima, G. A.
    Mustafa, F.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 38 - 38
  • [44] Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice
    Tamara Tobias
    Fady I. Sharara
    Jason M. Franasiak
    Patrick W. Heiser
    Emily Pinckney-Clark
    Fertility Research and Practice, 2 (1)
  • [45] REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER: IS LOCATION EVERYTHING?
    Kapfhamer, J. D.
    Summers, K. M.
    Ryan, G.
    Munch, E. M.
    Collura, B.
    Adamson, G. D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E83 - E83
  • [46] DOES MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE DECREASE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER FOLLOWED BY ELECTIVE FROZEN DOUBLE EMBRYO TRANSFER?
    Monteleone, P. A.
    Mirisol, R. J.
    Fujii, M. G.
    Rodrigues, D.
    Gomes, A. P.
    Goncalves, S. P.
    Miorin, J.
    Petersen, P.
    Baracat, E. C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E58 - E59
  • [47] Challenges to Patient Choice of Elective Single Embryo Transfer (eSET) Versus Multiple Embryo Transfer (MET)
    Adamson, G. D.
    Collura, B.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (02) : E9 - E9
  • [48] Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer
    Luisa Lopez-Regalado, Maria
    Clavero, Ana
    Carmen Gonzalvo, Maria
    Serrano, Maria
    Martinez, Luis
    Mozas, Juan
    Rodriguez-Serrano, Fernando
    Fontes, Juan
    Castilla, Jose A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 178 : 192 - 198
  • [49] Delivery rates after elective single cryopreserved embryo transfer related to embryo survival
    Dupont, C.
    Hafhouf, E.
    Sermondade, N.
    Sellam, O.
    Herbemont, C.
    Boujenah, J.
    Faure, C.
    Levy, R.
    Poncelet, C.
    Hugues, J. N.
    Cedrin-Durnerin, I.
    Sonigo, C.
    Grynberg, M.
    Sifer, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 188 : 6 - 11
  • [50] Elective Single Embryo Transfer vs. Double Embryo Transfer: Evaluation of Pregnancy and Multiple Gestation Rates
    Heitmann, Ryan J.
    Burney, Richard O.
    Klein, Nancy
    Chow, Gregory E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (04) : S27 - S27