The role of master regulators such as HMGA1, SOX9, FOXA1 in the development of triple-negative breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Modi, Shail Rakesh
Andey, Terrick
Acquaah-Mensah, George
机构
[1] MCPHS, MA
来源
FASEB JOURNAL | 2022年 / 36卷
关键词
D O I
10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2616
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Breast Cancer (BrCA) is one of the most common cancers, causing mortality in women worldwide. Among the subtypes of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive type of cancer due to the absence of three major receptors, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2). Treatment options for TNBC include chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation; however, these are associated with severe adverse effects and acquired resistance. We hypothesized that the identification of new molecular targets in TNBC, and characterization of their molecular biology will enhance therapeutic outcomes and improve patient survival. This study aims to investigate TNBC biology by analyzing transcriptional regulatory networks (TRN) inherent in BrCA samples. METHODS: We initiated our work by using data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We divided the dataset into two groups: triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) and TNBC. We used Bioconductor packages such as siggenes in R and identified genes that were differentially expressed (DEG) between these groups Similarly, we used the protein expression data and identified proteins differentially expressed (DEP) between these phenotypes. Pathways overrepresented among DEG and DEP were identified using another Bioconductor package, ReactomePA. For their impact on protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and biological pathways, those DEGs were mapped to a curated database of PPIs i.e. the STRING database. Additionally, the DEGs were superposed on two different inference algorithm-generated transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs). RESULTS: To identify the genes differentially expressed between the two phenotypes we used a false discovery rate of 5% and identified approximately 20000 genes and 128 proteins. Over-represented pathways among DEGs include "mitotic signaling" and "G1/S transition". Over-represented pathways among DEPs include "PI3K/Akt signaling", "platelet aggregation" as well as "diseases of signal transduction". Some known pro-oncogenic markers, such as FOXM1, NOTCH1, CDK1, PARP1, and NDRG1, were found linked in physical interaction (PPI) with other markers. The Virtual Inference of Protein-activity by Enriched Regulon analysis (VIPER) algorithm was used to identify find master regulators driving the gene expression differences between the two phenotypes. They include NFE2L3, HMGA1, TP53, FOXC1, and SOX9 (all up-regulated in TNBC), and FOXA1, AR, XBP1, and ESR1 (all down-regulated in TNBC). CONCLUSION: These results illustrate sharp transcriptomic and proteomic differences between TNBC and TPBC. HMGA1 has been identified to be overexpressed in various cancers and it regulates the expression of various other genes. It works with various molecular partners that essentially play a role in the development of breast cancer. FOXA1 another master regulator which we found is a tumor suppressor and is downregulated in the TNBC group compared to the TPBC group. The absence of ER, PR, and HER2 expression in TNBC shapes gene and protein expression and activities in consequential ways underscored by these pathways, interactions, and master regulators. © FASEB.
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Expression of ERCC1 in triple-negative breast cancer
    Ozkan, C.
    Gumuskaya, B.
    Yaman, S.
    Aksoy, S.
    Guler, G.
    Altundag, M. K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [32] BRCA1 methylation in triple-negative breast cancer
    Kawachi, A.
    Okochi-Takada, E.
    Shimoi, T.
    Shimomura, A.
    Kodaira, M.
    Yunokawa, M.
    Yonemori, K.
    Shimizu, C.
    Fujiwara, Y.
    Ushijima, T.
    Tamura, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 : 28 - 29
  • [33] Expression of MAS1 in triple-negative breast cancer
    Luo, Yi
    Kitadai, Yasuhiko
    Nishiguchi, Yukiko
    Fujiwara, Rina
    Sasaki, Takamitsu
    Ohmori, Hitoshi
    Kuniyasu, Hiroki
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [34] BRCA1 testing for triple-negative breast cancer
    Bennet, Neil
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (04): : E143 - E143
  • [35] Role of ICAM1 in tumor immunity and prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer
    Zhou, Qin
    Xu, Jiawei
    Xu, Yan
    Sun, Shaokun
    Chen, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [36] Elucidating the role of AIB1 in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines
    Saenz, Francisco R.
    Riegel, Anna T.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (03)
  • [37] Targeting S100A10, a SOX9 binding protein, for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer
    Ma, Yanxia
    Qian, Jing
    Moyer, Cassandra
    Lanier, Amanda
    Hill, Jamal
    Coleman, Darian
    Hawke, David H.
    Mazumdar, Abhijit
    Brown, Powel H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [38] The role of PARP-1-mediated FoxA1 ADP-ribosylation in breast cancer biology
    Camacho, Cristel V.
    Sundaresan, Aishwarya
    Nandu, Tulip
    Kraus, W. Lee
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (03)
  • [39] Prognostic role of BRCA1 mutation in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Maksimenko, Jelena
    Irmejs, Arvids
    Nakazawa-Miklasevica, Miki
    Melbarde-Gorkusa, Inga
    Trofimovics, Genadijs
    Gardovskis, Janis
    Miklasevics, Edvins
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 7 (01) : 278 - 284
  • [40] Should Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Androgen Receptor, and FOXA1 Expression Predict the Clinical Outcome in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients?
    Mangia, Anita
    Saponaro, Concetta
    Vagheggini, Alessandro
    Opinto, Giuseppina
    Centonze, Matteo
    Vicenti, Chiara
    Popescu, Ondina
    Pastena, Maria
    Giotta, Francesco
    Silvestris, Nicola
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (09)