A Mildly Relativistic Outflow Launched Two Years after Disruption in Tidal Disruption Event AT2018hyz

被引:46
|
作者
Cendes, Y. [1 ]
Berger, E. [1 ]
Alexander, K. D. [2 ,3 ]
Gomez, S. [4 ]
Hajela, A. [2 ,3 ]
Chornock, R. [5 ]
Laskar, T. [6 ]
Margutti, R. [5 ]
Metzger, B. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Bietenholz, M. F. [10 ]
Brethauer, D. [5 ]
Wieringa, M. H. [11 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Astrophys Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Explorat & Res Astrophys CI, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Space Telescope Sci Inst, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Astrophys IMAPP, POB 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Phys, Pupin Hall, New York, NY 10027 USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Columbia Astrophys Lab, Pupin Hall, New York, NY 10027 USA
[9] Flatiron Inst, Ctr Computat Astrophys, 162 5th Ave, New York, NY 10010 USA
[10] York Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[11] CSIRO Space & Astron, POB 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 2022年 / 938卷 / 01期
关键词
RADIO-EMISSION; LIGHT CURVES; BLACK-HOLES; DEBRIS; STARS; JET;
D O I
10.3847/1538-4357/ac88d0
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present late-time radio/millimeter (as well as optical/UV and X-ray) detections of tidal disruption event (TDE) AT2018hyz, spanning 970-1300 d after optical discovery. In conjunction with earlier deeper limits, including those at approximate to 700 days, our observations reveal rapidly rising emission at 0.8-240 GHz, steeper than F ( nu ) proportional to t (5) relative to the time of optical discovery. Such a steep rise cannot be explained in any reasonable scenario of an outflow launched at the time of disruption (e.g., off-axis jet, sudden increase in the ambient density), and instead points to a delayed launch. Our multifrequency data allow us to directly determine the radius and energy of the radio-emitting outflow, and we find from our modeling that the outflow was launched approximate to 750 days after optical discovery. The outflow velocity is mildly relativistic, with beta approximate to 0.25 and approximate to 0.6 for a spherical geometry and a 10 degrees jet geometry, respectively, and the minimum kinetic energy is E ( K ) approximate to 5.8 x 10(49) and approximate to 6.3 x 10(49) erg, respectively. This is the first definitive evidence for the production of a delayed mildly relativistic outflow in a TDE; a comparison to the recently published radio light curve of ASASSN-15oi suggests that the final rebrightening observed in that event (at a single frequency and time) may be due to a similar outflow with a comparable velocity and energy. Finally, we note that the energy and velocity of the delayed outflow in AT2018hyz are intermediate between those of past nonrelativistic TDEs (e.g., ASASSN-14li, AT2019dsg) and the relativistic TDE Sw J1644+57. We suggest that such delayed outflows may be common in TDEs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DISCOVERY OF AN OUTFLOW FROM RADIO OBSERVATIONS OF THE TIDAL DISRUPTION EVENT ASASSN-14li
    Alexander, K. D.
    Berger, E.
    Guillochon, J.
    Zauderer, B. A.
    Williams, P. K. G.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2016, 819 (02)
  • [22] Rapid Accretion State Transitions following the Tidal Disruption Event AT2018fyk
    Wevers, T.
    Pasham, D. R.
    van Velzen, S.
    Miller-Jones, J. C. A.
    Uttley, P.
    Gendreau, K. C.
    Remillard, R.
    Arzoumanian, Z.
    Lowenstein, M.
    Chiti, A.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 912 (02):
  • [23] Day-time-scale variability in the radio light curve of the Tidal Disruption Event AT2022cmc: confirmation of a highly relativistic outflow
    Rhodes, L.
    Bright, J. S.
    Fender, R.
    Sfaradi, I
    Green, D. A.
    Horesh, A.
    Mooley, K.
    Pasham, D.
    Smartt, S.
    Titterington, D. J.
    van der Horst, A. J.
    Williams, D. R. A.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 521 (01) : 389 - 395
  • [24] Linear and Circular Polarimetry of the Optically Bright Relativistic Tidal Disruption Event AT 2022cmc
    Cikota, Aleksandar
    Leloudas, Giorgos
    Bulla, Mattia
    Dai, Lixin
    Maund, Justyn
    Andreoni, Igor
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2023, 943 (02)
  • [25] AT 2019avd: A Tidal Disruption Event with a Two-phase Evolution
    Chen, Jin-Hong
    Dou, Li-Ming
    Shen, Rong-Feng
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 928 (01):
  • [26] A Second Radio Flare from the Tidal Disruption Event AT2020vwl: A Delayed Outflow Ejection?
    Goodwin, A. J.
    Mummery, A.
    Laskar, T.
    Alexander, K. D.
    Anderson, G. E.
    Bietenholz, M.
    Bonnerot, C.
    Christy, C. T.
    Golay, W.
    Lu, W.
    Margutti, R.
    Miller-Jones, J. C. A.
    Ramirez-Ruiz, E.
    Saxton, R.
    van Velzen, S.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 981 (02):
  • [27] On the formation of a quasi-stationary twisted disc after a tidal disruption event
    Xiang-Gruess, M.
    Ivanov, P. B.
    Papaloizou, J. C. B.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 463 (02) : 2242 - 2264
  • [28] High-energy neutrino emission from tidal disruption event outflow-cloud interactions
    Wu, Hanji
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Kai
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (04)
  • [29] AT2018fyk: Candidate Tidal Disruption Event by a (Super)Massive Black Hole Binary
    Wen, S.
    Jonker, P. G.
    Levan, A. J.
    Li, D.
    Stone, N. C.
    Zabludoff, A. I.
    Cao, Z.
    Wevers, T.
    Pasham, D. R.
    Lewin, C.
    Kara, E.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 970 (02):
  • [30] An outflow powers the optical rise of the nearby, fast-evolving tidal disruption event AT2019qiz
    Nicholl, M.
    Wevers, T.
    Oates, S. R.
    Alexander, K. D.
    Leloudas, G.
    Onori, F.
    Jerkstrand, A.
    Gomez, S.
    Campana, S.
    Arcavi, I
    Charalampopoulos, P.
    Gromadzki, M.
    Ihanec, N.
    Jonker, P. G.
    Lawrence, A.
    Mandel, I
    Schulze, S.
    Short, P.
    Burke, J.
    McCully, C.
    Hiramatsu, D.
    Howell, D. A.
    Pellegrino, C.
    Abbot, H.
    Anderson, J. P.
    Berger, E.
    Blanchard, P. K.
    Cannizzaro, G.
    Chen, T-W
    Dennefeld, M.
    Galbany, L.
    Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.
    Hosseinzadeh, G.
    Inserra, C.
    Irani, I.
    Kuin, P.
    Muller-Bravo, T.
    Pineda, J.
    Ross, N. P.
    Roy, R.
    Smartt, S. J.
    Smith, K. W.
    Tucker, B.
    Wyrzykowski, L.
    Young, D. R.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 499 (01) : 482 - 504