Reconstruction of the near-offset gap in marine seismic data using seismic interferometric interpolation

被引:2
|
作者
Xu, Zhuo [1 ,2 ]
Sopher, Daniel [3 ]
Juhlin, Christopher [3 ]
Han, Liguo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Geoexplorat Sci & Technol, Changchun 130026, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Land & Resources, Key Lab Appl Geophys, Changchun 130026, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Villavagen 16, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Interferometric interpolation; Cross-correlation; Multiple; Near-offset gap; Interferometry; MULTIPLE REFLECTIONS; TRACE INTERPOLATION; SPARSE INVERSION; ATTENUATION; PRIMARIES;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2478.12599
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In conventional seismic exploration, especially in marine seismic exploration, shot gathers with missing near-offset traces are common. Interferometric interpolation methods are one of a range of different methods that have been developed to solve this problem. Interferometric interpolation methods differ from conventional interpolation methods as they utilise information from multiples in the interpolation process. In this study, we apply both conventional interferometric interpolation (shot domain) and multi-domain interferometric interpolation (shot and receiver domain) to a synthetic and a real-towed marine dataset from the Baltic Sea with the primary aim of improving the image of the seabed by extrapolation of a near-offset gap. We utilise a matching filter after interferometric interpolation to partially mitigate artefacts and coherent noise associated with the far-field approximation and a limited recording aperture size. The results show that an improved image of the seabed is obtained after performing interferometric interpolation. In most cases, the results from multi-domain interferometric interpolation are similar to those from conventional interferometric interpolation. However, when the source-receiver aperture is limited, the multi-domain method performs better. A quantitative analysis for assessing the performance of interferometric interpolation shows that multi-domain interferometric interpolation typically performs better than conventional interferometric interpolation. We also benchmark the interpolated results generated by interferometric interpolation against those obtained using sparse recovery interpolation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Radon domain interferometric interpolation of sparse seismic data
    Shao, Jie
    Wang, Yibo
    Chang, Xu
    GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 86 (05) : WC89 - WC104
  • [12] Seismic data reconstruction by inversion to common offset
    Chemingui, N
    Biondi, B
    GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 67 (05) : 1575 - 1585
  • [13] Seismic reflection data interpolation with differential offset and shot continuation
    Fomel, S
    GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 68 (02) : 733 - 744
  • [14] SHEAR SOURCE MULTIAZIMUTH NEAR-OFFSET AND FAR-OFFSET VERTICAL SEISMIC PROFILES, ASAL RIFT, REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI
    HIRN, A
    MAGNIER, SA
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1992, 97 (B13) : 19949 - 19960
  • [15] PROCESSING LARGE OFFSET MARINE SEISMIC DATA - EXPERIENCE WITH THE LARGE APERTURE SEISMIC EXPERIMENT
    BUHL, P
    ALSOP, J
    GEOPHYSICS, 1983, 48 (04) : 431 - 431
  • [16] An explicit fractal interpolation algorithm for reconstruction of seismic data
    Li Xin-Fu
    Li Xiao-Fan
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2008, 25 (03) : 1157 - 1159
  • [17] Near-Offset Gap Trace Extrapolation Based on Self-Supervised Learning
    Park, Jiho
    Kim, Sooyoon
    Seol, Soon Jee
    Byun, Joongmoo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62 : 1 - 1
  • [18] Interferometric interpolation of sparse marine data
    Hanafy, Sherif M.
    Schuster, Gerard T.
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2014, 62 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [19] SLOWNESS TIME MAPPING OF NEAR OFFSET SEISMIC-REFLECTION DATA
    HARDING, AJ
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 80 (02): : 463 - 492
  • [20] Seismic data interpolation using deep internal learning
    Wang, Qin
    Shen, Yuantong
    Fu, Lihua
    Li, Hongwei
    EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 51 (06) : 683 - 697