Constraining thawing dark energy using galaxy cluster number counts

被引:7
|
作者
Devi, N. Chandrachani [1 ,2 ]
Choudhury, T. Roy [3 ,4 ]
Sen, Anjan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jamia Millia Islamia, Ctr Theoret Phys, New Delhi 110025, India
[2] Observ Nacl, Dept Astron, BR-20921400 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Harish Chandra Res Inst, Allahabad 211019, Uttar Pradesh, India
[4] TIFR, Natl Ctr Radio Astrophys, Pune 411007, Maharashtra, India
关键词
cosmological parameters; theory; dark energy; large-scale structure of Universe; SPHERICAL COLLAPSE MODEL; MASS FUNCTION; COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS; SIMULATIONS; PREDICTIONS; EVOLUTION; ABUNDANCE; MATTER;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stt570
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We study the formation of galaxy clusters in the presence of thawing class of scalar field dark energy (DE). We consider cases where the scalar field has canonical as well as non-canonical kinetic terms in its action. We also consider various forms for the potential of the scalar field, e.g. linear, quadratic, inverse quadratic, exponential as well as Pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Boson (PNGB) type. Moreover, we investigate a situation where DE is homogeneous along with a situation where DE takes part in virialization process. We use the Sheth-Tormen formalism while calculating the number density of galaxy clusters. Our results show that cluster number density for different DE models has a significant deviation from the corresponding value for the Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) case. The deviation is more for higher redshifts. Moreover, the tachyon-type scalar field with linear potential has the highest deviation from the Lambda CDM case. For the total cluster number counts, different DE models can have substantial deviation from Lambda CDM and this deviation is most significant around z similar to 0.5 for all the models we considered. We also constrain thawing class of models using the presently available data for number counts of massive X-ray clusters. The results show that current cluster data are not suitable enough for constraining potentials for the thawing scalar fields as well as for other cosmological parameters like n(s). But one can get significant constraint for the parameter Sigma(8) and a lower bound on (m0).
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1524
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Confronting dark energy models using galaxy cluster number counts
    Basilakos, S.
    Plionis, M.
    Lima, J. A. S.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2010, 82 (08):
  • [2] Constraining thawing and freezing models with cluster number counts
    Chandrachani Devi, N.
    Gonzalez, J. E.
    Alcaniz, J. S.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2014, (06):
  • [3] Constraining ultra-light axions with galaxy cluster number counts
    Diehl, J.
    Weller, J.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2021, (08):
  • [4] Constraining the evolution of dark energy with a combination of galaxy cluster observables
    Wang, S
    Khoury, J
    Haiman, Z
    May, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 70 (12): : 123008 - 1
  • [5] Suppression without Thawing: Constraining Structure Formation and Dark Energy with Galaxy Clustering
    Chen, Shi-Fan
    Ivanov, Mikhail M.
    Philcox, Oliver H. E.
    Wenzl, Lukas
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2024, 133 (23)
  • [6] Constraining the dark energy with galaxy cluster x-ray data
    Lima, JAS
    Cunha, JV
    Alcaniz, JS
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2003, 68 (02)
  • [7] Cluster number counts dependence on dark energy inhomogeneities and coupling to dark matter
    Manera, M.
    Mota, D. F.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 371 (03) : 1373 - 1380
  • [8] Constraining neutrinos and dark energy with galaxy clustering in the dark energy survey
    Zablocki, Alan
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2016, 94 (04)
  • [9] Combining cluster number counts and galaxy clustering
    Lacasa, Fabien
    Rosenfeld, Rogerio
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2016, (08):
  • [10] Spherical collapse and cluster number counts in dark energy models disformally coupled to dark matter
    Sapa, Stharporn
    Karwan, Khamphee
    Mota, David F.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2018, 98 (02)