Characterizing explanatory models of illness in healthcare: Development and validation of the CONNECT instrument

被引:28
|
作者
Haidet, Paul [1 ,2 ]
O'Malley, Kimberly J. [3 ]
Sharf, Barbara F. [4 ]
Gladney, Alicia P. [5 ]
Greisinger, Anthony J. [6 ,7 ]
Street, Richard L., Jr. [4 ]
机构
[1] DeBakey Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Houston Ctr Qual Care & Utilizat Studies, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Pearson Educ Measurement, Austin, TX USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Speech, College Stn, TX USA
[5] Harris Cty Dept Educ, Houston, TX USA
[6] Kelsey Res Fdn, Houston, TX USA
[7] Kelsey Seybold Clin, Houston, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Physician-patient relations; Cultural diversity; Patient-centered care; Anthropology; Cultural; Patient participation; Psychometrics; Primary health care;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: A growing body of qualitative and quantitative research suggests that individual patients and physicians often have differing perspectives, or 'explanatory models,' regarding the patient's health condition of illness. Discordance between explanatory models may lead to difficulties in communication and poor disease outcomes. However, due to a lack of tools to systematically measure concordance in patient and physician explanatory models, a large-scale study of explanatory models of illness has not been previously possible. The objective of this project was to develop and pilot-test a survey-based tool (the CONNECT Instrument) that measures salient aspects of explanatory models of illness. Methods: We conducted a multi-method survey development project that included qualitative and quantitative item development, refinement, pilot testing, and psychometric evaluation. We evaluated the instrument in two unique, consecutive cohorts of primary care patients in a variety of private and public settings in Houston, TX. We also used the instrument to examine concordance between patient and physician explanatory models in the second cohort. Results: The final version of the CONNECT Instrument contains nineteen items that focus on six dimensions of explanatory models. Cronbach alphas ranged from 0.65 to 0.89 for the six CONNECT dimensions. The instrument demonstrated evidence of criterion-related validity when individual CONNECT dimension scores were compared with scores from previously published instruments, and demonstrated expected differences between patients 'and physicians' explanatory models of illness. Conclusion: The CONNECT instrument is a tool with good psychometric properties that enables researchers to measure important aspects of patients 'and physicians' explanatory models of illness. Our continuing work will focus oil gathering additional validity evidence and evaluating associations between explanatory model concordance and health outcomes. Practice implications: The CONNECT instrument can be used to improve quality in clinical practice and medical education by measuring an important intermediate outcome in the chain of factors leading to patient trust, satisfaction, and adherence. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 239
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Explanatory models for mental illness endorsed by Christian clergymen: The development and use of an instrument in Singapore
    Mathews, Mathew
    MENTAL HEALTH RELIGION & CULTURE, 2008, 11 (03) : 287 - 300
  • [2] The CONNECT Instrument and Perception of Illness in Inpatient Pediatrics
    Magner, Kristin K.
    Lee, K. Jane
    Bragg, Dawn J.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE, 2016, 30 (04) : 301 - 302
  • [3] Explanatory models for psychiatric illness
    Kendler, Kenneth S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 165 (06): : 695 - 702
  • [4] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR CHARACTERIZING FOOD-RELATED BEHAVIOR
    WILLIAMS, AC
    PENFIELD, MP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1985, 85 (06) : 685 - 689
  • [5] The Negative Behaviors in Healthcare Survey: Instrument Development and Validation
    Layne, Diana M.
    Nemeth, Lynne S.
    Mueller, Martina
    Wallston, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2019, 27 (02) : 221 - 233
  • [6] Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Patient Experience of Chronic Illness Care
    Joaquin Mira, Jose
    Nuno-Solinis, Roberto
    Guilabert-Mora, Mercedes
    Solas-Gaspar, Olga
    Fernandez-Cano, Paloma
    Asuncin Gonzalez-Mestre, Maria
    Contel, Joan Carlos
    del Rio-Camara, Mario
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2016, 16
  • [7] Direct and indirect assessment of explanatory models of illness
    Ghane, Samrad
    Kolk, Annemarie M.
    Emmelkamp, Paul M. G.
    TRANSCULTURAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 49 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [8] Development and validation of a 360-degree-feedback instrument for healthcare administrators
    Garman, AN
    Tyler, JL
    Darnall, JS
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 49 (05) : 307 - 321
  • [9] The stigma of mental illness: Explanatory models and methods for change
    Corrigan, PW
    Kerr, A
    Knudsen, L
    APPLIED & PREVENTIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 11 (03): : 179 - 190
  • [10] Quality of Life and Explanatory Models of Illness in Patients with Schizophrenia
    Jacob, Jibi A.
    Kuruvilla, Anju
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 40 (04) : 328 - 334