Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization

被引:22
|
作者
Ohlsson, Arne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shah, Vibhuti S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
Labor; Obstetric; Streptococcus agalactiae; Ampicillin [therapeutic use; Anti-Bacterial Agents [therapeutic use; Carrier State [drug therapy; Infant; Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission; Vertical; prevention; control; Penicillin G [therapeutic use; Penicillins [therapeutic use; Streptococcal Infections [prevention & control; transmission; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; SEROLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION; INTRAMUSCULAR PENICILLIN; NEONATAL SEPTICEMIA; RISK-FACTORS; DISEASE; CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS; PROPHYLAXIS; INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007467.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Maternal colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) during pregnancy increases the risk of neonatal infection by vertical transmission. Administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) during labor has been associated with a reduction in early onset GBS disease (EOGBSD). However, treating all colonized women during labor exposes a large number of women and infants to possible adverse effects without benefit. Objectives To assess the effect of IAP for maternal GBS colonization on neonatal: 1) all cause mortality and 2) morbidity from proven and probable EOGBSD, late onset GBS disease (LOD), maternal infectious outcomes and allergic reactions to antibiotics. Search methods We updated the search of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register on 10 November 2012. Selection criteria Randomized trials assessing the impact of maternal IAP on neonatal GBS infections were included. Data collection and analysis We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies. Main results We did not identify any new trials from the updated search so the results remain unchanged as follows. Three trials (involving 852 women) evaluating the effects of IAP versus no treatment were included. The risk of bias was high. The use of IAP did not significantly reduce the incidence of all cause mortality, mortality from GBS infection or from infections caused by bacteria other than GBS. The incidence of early GBS infection was reduced with IAP compared to no treatment (risk ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.74, three trials, 488 infants; risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.01; number needed to treat to benefit 25, 95% CI 14 to 100, I-2 0%). The incidence of LOD or sepsis from organisms other than GBS and puerperal infection was not significantly different between groups. One trial (involving 352 women) compared intrapartum ampicillin versus penicillin and reported no significant difference in neonatal or maternal outcomes. Authors' conclusions Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to reduce EOGBSD, but this result may well be a result of bias as we found a high risk of bias for one or more key domains in the study methodology and execution. There is lack of evidence from well designed and conducted trials to recommend IAP to reduce neonatal EOGBSD. Ideally the effectiveness of IAP to reduce neonatal GBS infections should be studied in adequately sized double-blind controlled trials. The opportunity to conduct such trials has likely been lost, as practice guidelines (albeit without good evidence) have been introduced in many jurisdictions.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The influence of intrapartum antibiotics on the clinical spectrum of early-onset group B streptococcal infection in term infants
    Bromberger, P
    Lawrence, JM
    Braun, D
    Saunders, B
    Contreras, R
    Petitti, DB
    PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (02) : 244 - 250
  • [42] MATERNAL VS INFANT COLONIZATION - WHICH BETTER PREDICTS GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCAL DISEASE
    REGAN, J
    ONEILL, J
    CHAO, S
    JAMES, LS
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1979, 13 (04) : 393 - 393
  • [43] Relationship between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and group B streptococcal colonization dynamics in Japanese mother-neonate pairs
    Shibata, Meiwa
    Morozumi, Miyuki
    Maeda, Naonori
    Komiyama, Osamu
    Shiro, Hiroyuki
    Iwata, Satoshi
    Ubukata, Kimiko
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 27 (07) : 977 - 983
  • [44] GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCAL COLONIZATION IN MEDELLIN, COLOMBIA
    TRUJILLO, H
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1990, 9 (03) : 224 - 224
  • [45] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCAL COLONIZATION IN PREGNANCY
    REGAN, JA
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1983, 19 (10): : 906 - 909
  • [46] GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCAL COLONIZATION AND PRETERM LABOR
    MCDONALD, H
    VIGNESWARAN, R
    OLOUGHLIN, JA
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 29 (03): : 291 - 293
  • [47] Screening pregnant women for group B streptococcal colonization
    Madani, TA
    Harding, GK
    Helewa, M
    Alfa, MJ
    INFECTION, 1998, 26 (05) : 288 - 291
  • [48] Screening pregnant women for group B streptococcal colonization
    T. A. Madani
    G. K. Harding
    M. Helewa
    M. J. Alfa
    Infection, 1998, 26 : 288 - 291
  • [49] Sexually associated group B streptococcal subtype colonization
    Canavan, T
    Krohn, M
    Hillier, S
    Ferrieri, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S61 - S61
  • [50] Group B Streptococcal Colonization, Molecular Characteristics, and Epidemiology
    Shabayek, Sarah
    Spellerberg, Barbara
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9