Determinants of idiosyncratic risk: evidence from BRICS countries

被引:0
|
作者
Kausar, Saba [1 ]
Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali [1 ]
Rashid, Abdul [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Islamic Univ, Dept Business Adm, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Int Islamic Univ, Int Inst Islamic Econ, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Idiosyncratic risk; Emerging countries; Determinants; Firms categories; Stock returns; Firm size; STOCK RETURNS; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; CROSS-SECTION; VOLATILITY; MOMENTUM; REVERSAL; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.1108/APJBA-10-2021-0539
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This study examines the determinants of idiosyncratic risk (IR) or unsystematic risk. The study also examines the determinants of IR by dividing the firms into different categories: beta-based firms, liquid and illiquid firms and financially constrained (FC) and unconstrained (FUC) firms. Design/methodology/approach The fixed effects static panel data model specifications are formulated based on Hausman (1978) test for BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) member countries over the period 2000-2019. Moreover, the t-test is applied to see whether the returns of different types of portfolios are significantly different. Findings The portfolio analysis results show that, on average, high IR firms tend to be small in size, highly leveraged, have low competitiveness, low profitability, less dividend yield and low returns for all the sampled countries. The sample paired t-test also confirms that a significant difference exists between extreme portfolios: small and large size and low IR and high IR portfolios. The panel regression results show that firm size, market power, price-to-earnings ratio, return on equity (ROE) and dividend yield negatively relates to IR. Yet, both leverage and liquidity are positively related to IR. However, the sign of momentum returns is mostly positive for the entire sample. The coefficient values for high-beta, FC and illiquid firms are more significant and large than the firms' counterparts for all BRICS member countries. These results support the hypothesis of an under-diversified portfolio and suggest that the above-mentioned firm-specific variables are the significant determinants of unsystematic risk. Practical implications The securities exchange commission, as the supervisor of the public limited companies, needs to increase its role in investor protection related to the uncertainty of investment in the capital market. Accordingly, in making investment decisions in a stock exchange, investors can use the information that captures unsystematic risk for investment decision-making. Originality/value This study is the first to explore the determinants of IR in top emerging countries. Second, none of the existing studies has focused on the determinants of the IR based on different categories of firms.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 574
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corporate bond prices and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from Australia
    Fang, Victor
    Hung, Chi-Hsiou D.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2014, 33 : 99 - 114
  • [42] The pricing of idiosyncratic risk: evidence from the implied volatility distribution
    Stephan Süss
    Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 2012, 26 (2): : 247 - 267
  • [43] Is CSR linked to idiosyncratic risk? Evidence from the copula approach
    Mefteh-Wali, Salma
    Rais, Hassen
    Schier, Guillaume
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 334 (1-3) : 799 - 814
  • [44] Costly arbitrage and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from short sellers
    Duan, Ying
    Hu, Gang
    McLean, R. David
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2010, 19 (04) : 564 - 579
  • [45] Impact of idiosyncratic and macroeconomic risks on capital structure: evidence from SADC countries
    Amelot, Lydie Myriam Marcelle
    Agathee, Ushad Subadar
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2021, 12 (03) : 400 - 422
  • [46] Economic fitness and economy growth potentiality: Evidence from BRICS and OECD countries
    Ma, Xinxin
    Zong, Xiangyu
    Chen, Ximing
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 50
  • [47] Do the carry trades respond to geopolitical risks? Evidence from BRICS countries
    Cepni, Oguzhan
    Emirmahmutoglu, Furkan
    Guney, Ibrahim Ethem
    Yilmaz, Muhammed Hasan
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2023, 47 (02)
  • [48] Testing the Current Account Sustainability for BRICS Countries: Evidence from a Nonlinear Framework
    Hasdemir, Esra
    Omay, Tolga
    Denaux, Zulal S.
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2019, 39 (01): : 310 - 320
  • [49] The Effects of Macro News on Exchange Rates Volatilities: Evidence from BRICS Countries
    Lin, Zhitao
    Ouyang, Ruolan
    Zhang, Xuan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2020, 56 (08) : 1817 - 1842
  • [50] Does investment in energy matter for economic growth? Evidence from BRICS countries
    Tabash, Mosab, I
    Farooq, Umar
    Al-Rdaydeh, Mahmoud
    Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh
    El Refae, Ghaleb A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 31 (07) : 3217 - 3232