Randomized, controlled trial of multimodal shoulder injection or intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

被引:24
|
作者
Han, Sun Sook [1 ]
Lee, Ye Hyun [2 ]
Oh, Joo Han [3 ]
Aminzai, Susan [4 ]
Kim, Sae Hoon [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Songnam, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] UCSD Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Clin Physiol Lab, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia; Multimodal shoulder injection; SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE BLOCK; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF; BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; INTERSCALENE BLOCK; TOTAL HIP; SURGERY; NAUSEA; BUPIVACAINE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-012-2202-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of postoperative pain control and adverse effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) and multimodal shoulder injection after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Seventy patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively randomized to receive either IV PCA or multimodal shoulder injections. Postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, and other adverse effects were assessed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. Use of rescue analgesics and antiemetics, level of satisfaction, and cost for both modalities were recorded. Pain was better controlled in the multimodal shoulder injection group at 2 h postoperatively (P = 0.001). However, the use of additional analgesics was greater in the multimodal shoulder injection group during 12-48 h after surgery (P < 0.001). The incidence of nausea within 12-24 h after surgery in the multimodal shoulder injection group (5.7 %) was less significant compared with that in the IV PCA group (31.4 %, P = 0.012), but no difference in overall incidence of the use of rescue antiemetics was observed between the groups (n.s.). No differences in adverse effects were noted between the groups. Patient satisfaction also showed no differences (n.s.). Costs required for both modalities were $20.3 for the multimodal shoulder injection and $157.8 for the IV PCA. Multimodal shoulder injection is a safe and effective modality for management of pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Considering the expense and need of special devices for IV PCA, multimodal shoulder injection may be an effective and safe alternative to IV PCA for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Randomized, controlled trial, Level I.
引用
收藏
页码:2877 / 2883
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analgesic Effect of Esketamine Combined with Tramadol for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Guo, Yihui
    Ding, Xue
    Wang, Sheng
    Wang, Fei
    Zheng, Zhongyi
    Zou, Lifeng
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2023, 16 : 3519 - 3528
  • [42] Randomized Controlled Trial of Epidural versus Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
    Kikuchi, Satoru
    Kuroda, Shinji
    Nishizaki, Masahiko
    Matsusaki, Takashi
    Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
    Kuwada, Kazuya
    Kagawa, Shunsuke
    Morimatsu, Hiroshi
    Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2018, 72 (01) : 95 - 98
  • [43] Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in postoperative analgesia after upper extremity surgery
    Tuncer S.
    Tosun Z.
    Yosunkaya A.
    Reisli R.
    Sentürk S.
    Savaci N.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2002, 25 (3) : 149 - 151
  • [44] Effect of oxycodone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after cesarean section: a randomized controlled study
    Nie, Jing-jing
    Sun, Shen
    Huang, Shao-qiang
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 : 2649 - 2655
  • [45] Efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after supratentorial intracranial surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial Clinical article
    Morad, Athir H.
    Winters, Bradford D.
    Yaster, Myron
    Stevens, Robert D.
    White, Elizabeth A.
    Thompson, Richard E.
    Weingart, Jon D.
    Gottschalk, Allan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 111 (02) : 343 - 350
  • [46] Effects of nefopam with fentanyl in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after arthroscopic orthopedic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized trial
    Oh, You Na
    Kim, Kyu Nam
    Jeong, Mi Ae
    Kim, Dong Won
    Kim, Ji Yoon
    Ki, Hyun Seo
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 48 (01) : 142 - 149
  • [47] Influence of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial
    Zhenxin Zhu
    Changming Wang
    Chao Xu
    Qingping Cai
    Gastric Cancer, 2013, 16 : 193 - 200
  • [48] Interscalene brachial plexus bolus block versus patient-controlled interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia for the first 48 hours after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Kim, Jong-Ho
    Koh, Hyun Jung
    Kim, Dong Kyu
    Lee, Hyo-Jin
    Kwon, Ki-Hyun
    Lee, Kwang-Yeol
    Kim, Yang-Soo
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (07) : 1243 - 1250
  • [49] Influence of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial
    Zhu, Zhenxin
    Wang, Changming
    Xu, Chao
    Cai, Qingping
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2013, 16 (02) : 193 - 200
  • [50] Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after major shoulder surgery - Effects on diaphragmatic and respiratory function
    Borgeat, A
    Perschak, H
    Bird, P
    Hodler, J
    Gerber, C
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (01) : 102 - 108