Use of Topical Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:15
|
作者
Mallepally, Abhinandan Reddy [1 ]
Mahajan, Rajat [1 ]
Rustagi, Tarush [1 ]
Goel, Shakti Amar [1 ]
Das, Kalidutta [1 ]
Chhabra, Harvinder Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Spinal Injuries Ctr, Dept Spine Serv, New Delhi, India
关键词
Spine surgery; Topical; Tranexamic acid; Surgical blood loss; Cost-effectiveness; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL HIP; TRANSFUSION RATES; SPINE SURGERY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2019.0134
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Nonrandomized, prospective, and case-controlled study. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of topically applied tranexamic acid (TXA) during different phases of spine surgery. Overview of Literature: Perioperative blood loss is the leading cause of postoperative anemia associated with prolonged stays in hospital and long recovery times. The direct and indirect costs involved pose a significant economic challenge in developing countries. There is no consensus for topical use of tranexamic acid in spine surgery. Methods: Patients requiring a single-level TLIF were divided into two groups. In the TXA group (n=75), the wound surface was soaked with TXA (1 g in 100 mL saline solution) for 3 minutes after exposure, after decompression, and before wound closure, and in the control group (n=175) using only saline. Intraoperative blood loss drain volume was recorded on each of the first 2 days immediately after surgery. An estimated cost analysis was made on the basis of the length of hospital stay and the blood transfusion. Results: IBL for the control group was 783.33 +/- 332.71 mL and for intervention group 410.57 +/- 189.72 mL (p <0.001). The operative time for control group was 3.24 +/- 0.38 hours and for intervention group 2.99 +/- 0.79 hours (p <0.695). Hemovac drainage on days 1 and 2 for control group was 167.10 +/- 53.83 mL and 99.33 +/- 37.5 mL, respectively, and for intervention group 107.03 +/- 44.37 mL and 53.38 +/- 21.99 mL, respectively (p <0.001). The length of stay was significantly shorter in the intervention group (4.8 +/- 1.1 days) compared to control group (7.0 +/- 2.3 days). The cost of treatment in the intervention group was US dollar (USD) 4,552.57 +/- 1,222.6 compared with that in the control group USD 6,529.9 +/- 1,505.04. Conclusions: Topical TXA is a viable, cost-effective method of decreasing perioperative blood loss in major spine surgery with fewer overall complications than other methods. Further studies are required to find the ideal dosage and timing.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Patel, Ravi
    Makda, Junaid
    Hong, Joseph
    Anderson, David G.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08): : 623 - 629
  • [2] Efficacy of gelatin-thrombin matrix sealants for blood loss in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Abe, Tetsutaro
    Miyazaki, Masashi
    Sako, Noriaki
    Kanezaki, Shozo
    Hirakawa, Masashi
    Kawano, Masanori
    Kaku, Nobuhiro
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (36) : E34667
  • [3] Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [4] Postoperative Opioid Use Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas M.
    Carter, Michael, V
    Curran, John G.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, I. David
    Woods, Barrett, I
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E546 - E554
  • [5] Postoperative Opioid Use Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas M.
    V. Carter, Michael
    Curran, John G.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, I. David
    Woods, Barrett I.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E546 - E554
  • [6] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Rezk, Essam Moneer Ali
    Elkholy, Ahmed Rizk
    Shamhoot, Ebrahim Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 34 (01)
  • [7] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Essam Moneer Ali Rezk
    Ahmed Rizk Elkholy
    Ebrahim Ahmed Shamhoot
    Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery, 34
  • [8] Response to: Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (06) : 885 - 886
  • [9] A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease
    Chang, Chung-Tse
    Lin, Yu-Hsien
    Wu, Yun-Che
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (19)
  • [10] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47