共 50 条
Neuromodulation for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
被引:34
|作者:
Padala, Prasad R.
[1
,2
,3
]
Boozer, Eugenia M.
[1
]
Lensing, Shelly Y.
[1
,4
]
Parkes, Christopher M.
[1
]
Hunter, Cassandra R.
[1
]
Dennis, Richard A.
[1
,3
]
Caceda, Ricardo
[5
]
Padala, Kalpana P.
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Cent Arkansas Vet Healthcare Syst CAVHS, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci UAMS, Dept Psychiat, Little Rock, AR USA
[3] UAMS, Dept Geriatr, Little Rock, AR USA
[4] UAMS, Dept Biostat, Little Rock, AR USA
[5] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychiat, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词:
Alzheimer's disease;
apathy;
behavioral problems in dementia;
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation;
TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;
MINI-MENTAL-STATE;
COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT;
OLDER-ADULTS;
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS;
PSYCHOLOGICAL SYMPTOMS;
DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA;
STRIATAL DOPAMINE;
METHYLPHENIDATE;
SAFETY;
D O I:
10.3233/JAD-200640
中图分类号:
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号:
071006 ;
摘要:
Background: Apathy, a profound loss of motivation, initiation, and goal directed cognition, is a common comorbidity of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The presence of apathy is associated with rapid progression of AD, long-term impairment, disability, and higher mortality. Pharmacological treatments of apathy are limited. Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for apathy in AD. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm, sham-controlled pilot study was conducted in subjects with AD and apathy (N=20). Subjects were randomized to rTMS or sham treatment (5 days/week) for four weeks. Primary outcome, apathy evaluation scale-clinician version (AES-C), and secondary outcome measures, modified-Mini Mental State Examination (3MS), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and clinical global impression (CGI), were assessed at baseline and four weeks. Follow-up visits were conducted at 8 and 12 weeks to test the durability of effects of intervention. Results: Mean age was 77.3 (+/- 7.2) years, 80% were Caucasians and 10% were females. After adjusting for baseline, there was a significantly greater improvement in the AES-C with rTMS compared to sham treatment (-10.1 (-15.9 to -4.3); t((16)) = -3.69; p = 0.002) at 4 weeks. There was also significantly greater improvement in 3MS (6.9 (1.7 to 12.0); t((15)) = 2.85; p = 0.012), IADL (3.4 (1.0 to 5.9); chi(2)1 = 7.72; p = 0.006), CGI-S (1.4 (0.5 to 2.3), t((16)) = 3.29; p = 0.005), and CGI-I (-2.56 (-3.5 to -1.6), t((17)) = -5.72; p < 0.001) for rTMS compared to the sham at 4 weeks. The effects of rTMS were durable at 12 weeks. Conclusion: rTMS may be safely used in subjects with AD and may improve apathy, function, and some aspects of cognition.
引用
收藏
页码:1483 / 1493
页数:11
相关论文