Effects of a Non-focal Plasticity Protocol on Apathy in Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Trial

被引:103
|
作者
Suemoto, Claudia Kimie [1 ]
Apolinario, Daniel [1 ]
Nakamura-Palacios, Ester Miyuki [2 ]
Lopes, Leonardo [1 ]
Paraizo Leite, Renata Elaine [3 ]
Sales, Manuela Castro [1 ]
Nitrini, Ricardo [4 ]
Brucki, Sonia Maria [4 ]
Morillo, Lilian Shafirovitz [1 ]
Magaldi, Regina Miksian [1 ]
Fregni, Felipe [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Discipline Geriatr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Dept Physiol Sci, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, LIM 22, Dept Pathol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Apathy; Dementia; Alzheimer's disease; Cognition; Depression; Transcranial direct current stimulation; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; DEMENTIA; METHYLPHENIDATE; MEMORY; DEPRESSION; EFFICACY; SCALE; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Apathy is the most common neuropsychiatric symptom in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and it is associated with changes in prefrontal neural circuits involved with generation of voluntary actions. To date no effective treatment for apathy has been demonstrated. Objective: We aimed to investigate the effects and safety of repetitive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on apathy in moderate AD patients. Methods: Forty patients were randomized to receive either active or sham-tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Patients received six sessions of intervention during 2 weeks and were evaluated at baseline, at week 1 and 2, and after 1 week without intervention. Clinical raters, patients, and caregivers were blinded. The primary outcome was apathy. Global cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms were examined as secondary outcomes. Results: The mean MMSE score at baseline was 15.2 +/- 2.9 and the mean Apathy Scale score was 27.7 +/- 6.7. Changes on apathy scores over time were not different between active and sham tDCS (P = 0.552 for repeated measures). Further analyses confirm that changes from baseline did not differ between groups after the sixth session (active tDCS -1.95 (95%CI -3.49, -0.41); sham-tDCS -2.05 (95% Cl -3.68, 0.42); P = 0.9891. Similarly, tDCS had no effect on secondary outcomes (P > 0.40). tDCS was well tolerated and not associated with significant adverse effects. Conclusion: In this adequately powered study for minimal clinically significant difference, our findings show that using the parameters we chose for this study, repeated anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC had no effect on apathy in elderly patients with moderate AD. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 313
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuromodulation for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
    Padala, Prasad R.
    Boozer, Eugenia M.
    Lensing, Shelly Y.
    Parkes, Christopher M.
    Hunter, Cassandra R.
    Dennis, Richard A.
    Caceda, Ricardo
    Padala, Kalpana P.
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2020, 77 (04) : 1483 - 1493
  • [2] Effects of acupuncture for initiation of labor: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial
    Ladan Ajori
    Leila Nazari
    Dariush Eliaspour
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013, 287 : 887 - 891
  • [3] Effects of acupuncture for initiation of labor: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial
    Ajori, Ladan
    Nazari, Leila
    Eliaspour, Dariush
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (05) : 887 - 891
  • [4] A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Adaptive-Design Pivotal Trial of Sensory Stimulation in Subjects with Alzheimer's Disease
    Boasso, Alyssa
    Houser, Celine
    Hajos, Mihaly
    Newberger, Jennifer
    Seshagiri, Chandran
    Leach, Julia
    Konisky, Alexandra
    Galley, Alyssa
    Hempel, Evan
    Dickson, Samuel P.
    Hendrix, Suzanne B.
    Malchano, Zach
    Megerian, Jonathan Thomas
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2023, 19
  • [5] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Apathy in Parkinson's Disease: Results from a Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Fernandez, Hubert H.
    Bowers, Dawn
    Triggs, William J.
    Perlstein, William
    Hass, Chris J.
    Zahodne, Laura B.
    Okun, Michael S.
    Rodriguez, Ramon L.
    Malaty, Irene A.
    Wu, Samuel S.
    NEUROLOGY, 2010, 74 (09) : A352 - A352
  • [6] Protocol for Cerebellar Stimulation for Aphasia Rehabilitation (CeSAR): A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    Lammers, Becky
    Sydnor, Myra J.
    Cust, Sarah
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Yenokyan, Gayane
    Hillis, Argye E.
    Sebastian, Rajani
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [7] Gamma tACS over the precuneus in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, cross-over trial
    Benussi, A.
    Cantoni, V.
    Cotelli, M.
    Brattini, C.
    Datta, A.
    Thomas, C.
    Santarnecchi, E.
    Pascual-Leone, A.
    Borroni, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 : 340 - 340
  • [8] A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE GASTRIC BUBBLE FOR OBESITY
    HOGAN, RB
    JOHNSTON, JH
    LONG, BW
    SONES, JQ
    HINTON, LA
    BUNGE, J
    CORRIGAN, SA
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (05) : 381 - 385
  • [9] Exposure to gamma tACS in Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study
    Benussi, Alberto
    Cantoni, Valentina
    Cotelli, Maria Sofia
    Cotelli, Maria
    Brattini, Chiara
    Datta, Abhishek
    Thomas, Chris
    Santarnecchi, Emiliano
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Borroni, Barbara
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (03) : 531 - 540
  • [10] Combination of Acupuncture and Fluoxetine for Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Zhang, Wen-Jing
    Yang, Xin-Bo
    Zhong, Bao-Liang
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2009, 15 (08) : 837 - 844