Prognostic impact of systolic blood pressure variability in people with diabetes

被引:15
|
作者
Bell, Katy J. L. [1 ]
Azizi, Lamiae [2 ]
Nilsson, Peter M. [3 ]
Hayen, Andrew [4 ]
Irwig, Les [1 ]
Ostgren, Carl J. [5 ]
Sundrom, Johan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Math & Stat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Univ Hosp, Malmo, Sweden
[4] UTS, Australian Ctr Publ & Populat Hlth Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
TO-VISIT VARIABILITY; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; PRIMARY-CARE; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; EPISODIC HYPERTENSION; RISK; PREDICTION; EVENTS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0194084
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Blood pressure variability (BPV) has been associated with risk of cardiovascular events in observational studies, independently of mean BP levels. In states with higher autonomic imbalance, such as in diabetes, the importance of BP variability may theoretically be even greater. We aimed to investigate the incremental value of BPV for prediction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods We identified 9,855 patients without pre-existing cardiovascular disease who did not change BP-lowering treatment during the observation period from a Swedish primary health care cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. BPV was summarized as the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), or variation independent of mean (VIM). Patients were followed for a median of 4 years and associations with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results BPV was not associated with cardiovascular specific or all-cause mortality in the total sample. In patients who were not on BP-lowering drugs during the observation period (n = 2,949), variability measures were associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratios were 1.05, 1.04 and 1.05 for 50% increases in SD, CV and VIM, respectively, adjusted for Framingham risk score risk factors, including mean BP. However, the addition of the variability measures in this subgroup only led to very minimal improvement in discrimination, indicating they may have limited clinical usefulness (change in C-statistic ranged from 0.000-0.003 in all models). Conclusions Although BPV was independently associated with all-cause mortality in diabetes patients in primary care who did not have pre-existing cardiovascular disease or BP-lowering drugs, it may be of minimal clinical usefulness above and beyond that of other routinely measured predictors, including mean BP.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic relevance of visit-to-visit office blood pressure variability in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Same data, different conclusions?
    Chang, Tara I.
    Reboussin, David M.
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    Cheung, Alfred K.
    Cushman, William C.
    Kostis, William J.
    Parati, Gianfranco
    Riessen, Erik
    Shapiro, Brian
    Stergiou, George S.
    Tsioufis, Konstantinos
    Whelton, Paul K.
    Whittle, Jeffrey
    Wright, Jackson T.
    Papademetriou, Vasilios
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2018, 20 (11): : 1644 - 1645
  • [32] Systolic blood pressure - It is time to focus on systolic hypertension - especially in older people
    Basile, JN
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7370): : 917 - 918
  • [33] Prognostic significance of blood-pressure variability
    Michell, A. R.
    LANCET, 2010, 376 (9739): : 413 - 413
  • [34] PROGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE OF LOW VISIT-TO-VISIT SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY IN HIGH-RISK HYPERTENSION
    Del Pinto, Rita
    Pietropaoli, Davide
    Dobre, Mirela
    Ferri, Claudio
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 39 : E148 - E149
  • [35] Systolic blood pressure variability in four models of hypertension.
    Hinojosa-Laborde, C
    Lange, D
    Van Ness, JM
    Haywood, JR
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1999, 13 (05): : A771 - A771
  • [36] Evaluation Of Effectivity Of Baroreflex To Suppress The Systolic Blood Pressure Variability
    Krontoradova, K.
    Novakova, Z.
    Honzikova, N.
    Fiser, B.
    Zavodna, E.
    Krticka, A.
    Honzik, P.
    ANALYSIS OF BIOMEDICAL SIGNALS AND IMAGES, 2008, : 39 - 41
  • [37] Relationship Between Ventilatory Thresholds and Systolic Blood Pressure Variability
    Cottin, F.
    Le Moing, P.
    Filliau, C.
    Martin, V.
    Papelier, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 31 (09) : 604 - 609
  • [38] Digital Management of Hypertension Improves Systolic Blood Pressure Variability
    Milani, Richard, V
    Wilt, Jonathan K.
    Milani, Alexander R.
    Bober, Robert M.
    Malamud, Eric
    Entwisle, Jonathan
    Lavie, Carl J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 133 (07): : E355 - E359
  • [39] THE INFLUENCE OF AGE AND SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE ON BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY AMONG HEALTHY OLDER INDIVIDUALS
    Goh, C-H
    Ng, S-C
    Tan, M. P.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2017, 46
  • [40] How to demonstrate the prognostic impact of interdialytic home blood pressure variability in dialytic patients
    Marubayashi, Nanako
    Kakeshita, Kota
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (05)