Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties

被引:14
|
作者
Hsu, Clarissa [1 ]
Liss, David T. [2 ]
Frosch, Dominick L. [3 ,4 ]
Westbrook, Emily O. [1 ]
Arterburn, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Res Inst, 1730 Minor Ave,Ste 1600, Seattle, WA 98103 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Palo Alto Med Fdn, Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94301 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
qualitative methods; decision aids; shared decision making; health service research; decision aids-tools; BREAST-CANCER SURGERY; SUPPORT INTERVENTIONS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; PRIMARY-CARE; HEALTH; IMPLEMENTATION; ENCOUNTER; KNOWLEDGE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X16671933
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. A critical component of shared decision making (SDM) is the role played by health care providers in distributing decision aids (DAs) and initiating SDM conversations. Existing literature indicates that decisions about designing and implementing DAs must take provider perspectives into account. However, little is known about how differences in provider attitudes across specialties may impact DA implementation and how provider attitudes may shift after DA implementation. Group Health's Decision Aid Implementation project was carried out in six specialties using 12 video-based DAs for preference-sensitive conditions; this study focused on two of the six specialties. Design. In-depth, qualitative interviews with specialty care providers in two specialties-orthopedics and cardiology-at two time points during DA implementation. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results. We interviewed 19 care providers in orthopedics and cardiology. All respondents believed that providing patients with accurate information on their health conditions and treatment options was important and that most patients wanted an active role in decision making. However, respondents diverged in decision-making styles and views on the practicality and appropriateness of using the DAs and SDM. For example, cardiology specialists were ambivalent about DAs for coronary artery disease because many viewed DAs and SDM as unnecessary or inappropriate for this clinical condition. Provider attitudes towards DAs and SDM were generally stable over two years. Limitations. Limitations include a lack of patient perspectives, social desirability bias, and possible selection bias. Conclusions. Successfully implementing DAs in clinical practice to promote SDM requires addressing individual provider attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of SDM by specialty. During DA development and implementation, providers should be asked for input about the specific conditions and care processes that are most appropriate for SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 126
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Provider perspectives on shared decision-making regarding hypospadias surgery
    Chan, Katherine H.
    Misseri, Rosalia
    Cain, Mark P.
    Whittam, Benjamin
    Szymanski, Konrad
    Kaefer, Martin
    Rink, Richard
    Cockrum, Brandon
    Moore, Courtney
    Wiehe, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2020, 16 (03) : 307 - 315
  • [32] Lessons in Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Cancer Care
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Vinter, Mette
    Cruger, Dorthe
    Dankl, Kathrina
    Coulter, Angela
    Stuart, Brad
    Berry, Leonard L.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (04) : 229 - +
  • [33] Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
    Dawn Stacey
    France Légaré
    Anne Lyddiatt
    Anik M. C. Giguere
    Manosila Yoganathan
    Anton Saarimaki
    Jordi Pardo Pardo
    Tamara Rader
    Peter Tugwell
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2016, 9 : 571 - 582
  • [34] Shared decision making in pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease: design of a patient orientated decision aid
    Williams, Astrid-Jane
    Karimi, Neda
    Chari, Radha
    Connor, Susan
    De Vera, Mary A.
    Dieleman, Levinus A.
    Hansen, Tawnya
    Ismond, Kathleen
    Khurana, Rshmi
    Kingston, Dawn
    O'Connor, Katie
    Sadowski, Daniel C.
    Fang-Hwa, Flora
    Wine, Eytan
    Leung, Yvette
    Huang, Vivian
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [35] Shared decision making in pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease: design of a patient orientated decision aid
    Astrid-Jane Williams
    Neda Karimi
    Radha Chari
    Susan Connor
    Mary A. De Vera
    Levinus A. Dieleman
    Tawnya Hansen
    Kathleen Ismond
    Rshmi Khurana
    Dawn Kingston
    Katie O’Connor
    Daniel C. Sadowski
    Flora Fang-Hwa
    Eytan Wine
    Yvette Leung
    Vivian Huang
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [36] Development and Test of a Decision Aid for Shared Decision Making in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
    Mainz, Hanne
    Frandsen, Lone
    Lind, Martin
    Fauno, Peter
    Lomborg, Kirsten
    MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2022, 7 (01)
  • [37] Development and testing of a decision aid to achieve shared decision-making for routine labor induction
    Peralta, Ann
    Drainoni, Mari-Lynn
    Declercq, Eugene R.
    Belanoff, Candice M.
    Radoff, Kari
    Bearse, Emily
    Iverson Jr, Ronald E.
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2023, 50 (03): : 636 - 645
  • [38] Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype
    Stacey, Dawn
    Legare, France
    Lyddiatt, Anne
    Giguere, Anik M. C.
    Yoganathan, Manosila
    Saarimaki, Anton
    Pardo, Jordi Pardo
    Rader, Tamara
    Tugwell, Peter
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (06): : 571 - 582
  • [39] A novel validated patient decision aid to enhance shared decision making for the management of actinic keratosis
    Brent, Geoffrey
    Beardmore, Caroline
    Mayers, Kate
    Barea, Alberto
    Samarasinghe, Venura
    Pinder, Vanessa
    Soo, Julia
    Akhras, Victoria
    Jiyad, Zainab
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 191 : I45 - I46
  • [40] Aiding shared decision making in lung cancer screening: two decision tools
    Sferra, Shelby R.
    Cheng, Joyce S.
    Boynton, Zachary
    DiSesa, Verdi
    Kaiser, Larry R.
    Ma, Grace X.
    Erkmen, Cherie P.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 43 (03) : 673 - 680