Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties

被引:14
|
作者
Hsu, Clarissa [1 ]
Liss, David T. [2 ]
Frosch, Dominick L. [3 ,4 ]
Westbrook, Emily O. [1 ]
Arterburn, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Res Inst, 1730 Minor Ave,Ste 1600, Seattle, WA 98103 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Palo Alto Med Fdn, Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94301 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
qualitative methods; decision aids; shared decision making; health service research; decision aids-tools; BREAST-CANCER SURGERY; SUPPORT INTERVENTIONS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; PRIMARY-CARE; HEALTH; IMPLEMENTATION; ENCOUNTER; KNOWLEDGE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X16671933
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. A critical component of shared decision making (SDM) is the role played by health care providers in distributing decision aids (DAs) and initiating SDM conversations. Existing literature indicates that decisions about designing and implementing DAs must take provider perspectives into account. However, little is known about how differences in provider attitudes across specialties may impact DA implementation and how provider attitudes may shift after DA implementation. Group Health's Decision Aid Implementation project was carried out in six specialties using 12 video-based DAs for preference-sensitive conditions; this study focused on two of the six specialties. Design. In-depth, qualitative interviews with specialty care providers in two specialties-orthopedics and cardiology-at two time points during DA implementation. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results. We interviewed 19 care providers in orthopedics and cardiology. All respondents believed that providing patients with accurate information on their health conditions and treatment options was important and that most patients wanted an active role in decision making. However, respondents diverged in decision-making styles and views on the practicality and appropriateness of using the DAs and SDM. For example, cardiology specialists were ambivalent about DAs for coronary artery disease because many viewed DAs and SDM as unnecessary or inappropriate for this clinical condition. Provider attitudes towards DAs and SDM were generally stable over two years. Limitations. Limitations include a lack of patient perspectives, social desirability bias, and possible selection bias. Conclusions. Successfully implementing DAs in clinical practice to promote SDM requires addressing individual provider attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of SDM by specialty. During DA development and implementation, providers should be asked for input about the specific conditions and care processes that are most appropriate for SDM.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 126
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making
    Schroy, Paul C., III
    Mylvaganam, Shamini
    Davidson, Peter
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [2] Interactivity in a Decision Aid: Findings From a Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared Decision Making RCT
    Jimbo, Masahito
    Sen, Ananda
    Plegue, Melissa A.
    Hawley, Sarah
    Kelly-Blake, Karen
    Rapai, Mary
    Zhang, Minling
    Zhang, Yuhong
    Xie, Xiao
    Ruffin, Mack T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (01) : 77 - 86
  • [3] Shared Decision Making; A Decision Aid for the Primary Practitioner
    Grannis, F.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S962 - S962
  • [4] Shared decision making and the use of a patient decision aid in advanced serious illness: provider and patient perspectives
    Jones, Jacqueline
    Nowels, Carolyn
    Kutner, Jean S.
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 3236 - 3247
  • [5] A personalized decision aid for prostate cancer shared decision making
    Hilary P. Bagshaw
    Alejandro Martinez
    Nastaran Heidari
    David Scheinker
    Alan Pollack
    Radka Stoyanova
    Eric Horwitz
    Gerard Morton
    Amar U. Kishan
    Mark K. Buyyounouski
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21
  • [6] A personalized decision aid for prostate cancer shared decision making
    Bagshaw, Hilary P.
    Martinez, Alejandro
    Heidari, Nastaran
    Scheinker, David
    Pollack, Alan
    Stoyanova, Radka
    Horwitz, Eric
    Morton, Gerard
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Buyyounouski, Mark K.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [7] Validation of a prostate cancer decision aid tool for shared decision making
    Bloemen-van Gurp, E. J.
    Vanneste, B. G. L.
    Berlanga, A. J.
    Rijnkels, D.
    Van de Beek, K.
    Van Roermund, J.
    Lambin, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S240 - S241
  • [8] Is there shared decision making when the provider makes a recommendation?
    Frongillo, Marissa
    Feibelmann, Sandra
    Belkora, Jeff
    Lee, Clara
    Sepucha, Karen
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 90 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [9] Patient Decision Aid Selection for Shared Decision Making: A Multicase Qualitative Study
    LeRouge, Cynthia
    Nguyen, Ann M.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2022, 79 (02) : 267 - 280
  • [10] Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia
    Kochhar, Manpreet K.
    Grilo, Stephanie
    Robbins, Laura
    Catallozzi, Marina
    Neunert, Cindy
    BLOOD, 2020, 136