Integration Methods of Odds Ratio Based on Meta-Analysis Using Fixed and Random Effect Models Useful in Public Health

被引:0
|
作者
Catalan, Monica [1 ]
Purificacion Galindo, M. [2 ]
Martin, Javier [2 ]
Leiva, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valparaiso, Dept Estadist, Valparaiso, Chile
[2] Univ Salamanca, Dept Estadist, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
来源
REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE ESTADISTICA | 2012年 / 35卷 / 02期
关键词
Biostatistics; Clinical trials; Effect size; Medicine; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ASPIRIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis integrates information from different studies to generate a common response to a determined problem. In the literature, we find several integration methods of results, with the integration method of levels of probability being the more basic and, with a greater complexity, the integration method of the effect size, which uses fixed and random effect models. In this study, we compare the results of two estimation methods of the effect size based on meta-analysis using fixed and random effect models. The measure of the effect size considered here is the odds ratio, due to this measure is frequently used in systematic reviews of several topics of interest in public health, such as heart diseases, laparoscopic colectomy, Parkinson disease, tobacco addiction and uterine cervical cancer. Conclusions of this work indicate the applicability conditions of the analyzed estimators of the odds ratio in function of the size of the population effect, of the variability among studies, of the size of the meta-analysis and of the sample sizes of such studies.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 222
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using risk and odds ratios to assess effect size for meta-analysis outcome measures
    Alavi, Mousa
    Hunt, Glenn E.
    Visentin, Denis C.
    Watson, Roger
    Thapa, Deependra K.
    Cleary, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (12) : 3231 - 3234
  • [22] Fixed- versus random-effects model in meta-analysis: Application in combining relative risks and odds ratios.
    Zhang, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 145 (11) : 338 - 338
  • [23] Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects
    Martin Law
    Dan Jackson
    Rebecca Turner
    Kirsty Rhodes
    Wolfgang Viechtbauer
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16
  • [24] Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects
    Law, Martin
    Jackson, Dan
    Turner, Rebecca
    Rhodes, Kirsty
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [25] Fitting fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis models using structural equation modeling with the sem and gsem commands
    Palmer, Tom M.
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (03): : 645 - 671
  • [26] Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods
    Field, AP
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 6 (02) : 161 - 180
  • [27] Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge
    Hunter, JE
    Schmidt, FL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, 8 (04) : 275 - 292
  • [28] Coordinate based random effect size meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
    Tench, C. R.
    Tanasescu, Radu
    Constantinescu, C. S.
    Auer, D. P.
    Cottam, W. J.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 153 : 293 - 306
  • [29] Comparative role of various methods of estimating between study variance for meta-analysis using random effect method
    Pathak, Mona
    Dwivedi, Sada Nand
    Thakur, Bhaskar
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (01): : 185 - 189
  • [30] Constraints on general slowing: A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients
    Sliwinski, MJ
    Hall, CB
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1998, 13 (01) : 164 - 175