Impact of Oncotype DX on Treatment Decisions in ER-Positive, Node-Negative Breast Cancer with Histologic Correlation

被引:18
|
作者
Biroschak, Julianne R. [1 ]
Schwartz, Gordon F. [2 ]
Palazzo, Juan P. [3 ]
Toll, Adam D. [4 ]
Brill, Kristin L. [5 ]
Jaslow, Rebecca J. [6 ]
Lee, Sun Yong [7 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol Anat & Cell Biol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Cooper Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Voorhees, NJ USA
[6] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[7] Aria Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
BREAST JOURNAL | 2013年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; gene analysis; Oncotype Dx; 21-GENE RECURRENCE SCORE; GENE-EXPRESSION; ADJUVANT BREAST; ASSAY; RISK; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; TAMOXIFEN; PREDICT; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1111/tbj.12099
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Oncotype DX, a gene-expression profiling assay, provides stratification of patients with estrogen-receptor positive, lymph-node-negative early breast cancer into risk groups based on recurrence score, which are associated with distant recurrence and response to chemotherapy. This study aims to determine whether Oncotype DX influences clinicians' treatment decisions, and whether assay results correlate with histologic assessment. Fifty patients with estrogen-receptor positive, node-negative early breast cancer analyzed by Oncotype DX and operated on by two breast surgeons were included. To assess effect on treatment decisions, clinical vignettes were created by retrospective chart review. Physicians were then presented with the clinical vignettes and instructed to make a treatment decisions (i.e., hormone therapy alone versus hormone therapy combined with chemotherapy) both before and after knowledge of the recurrence score. To assess correlation with histologic assessment, a prospective, blinded review of tumor slides was performed by two pathologists. Based on this review, tumors were placed into low, intermediate and high risk groups for comparison with Oncotype DX assay results. Treatment decisions were changed based on Oncotype DX results in 36 and 18% of cases by breast surgeons and medical oncologists, respectively. All tumors categorized as high risk by Oncotype DX were categorized as high risk based on histologic assessment, and 96% of cases categorized as low risk by recurrence score were categorized as low or intermediate risk by histologic assessment. Oncotype DX significantly influences management of estrogen-receptor positive, lymph-node-negative early breast cancer. Further studies are needed to assess association of histologic categorization to assay results.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How Much Is Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Impacting the Adjuvant Treatment Management of Node-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients?
    Nguyen, M. T.
    Chen, Z.
    D'Alfonso, T.
    Stessin, A.
    Nagar, H.
    Hayes, M.
    Shin, S. J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 59A - 59A
  • [32] Real-life use of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test for the management of patients with node-negative and node-positive breast cancer in the autonomous community of Galicia (Spain)
    Fernandez-Perez, I.
    Antolin Novoa, S.
    De Paz Arias, L.
    Vazquez Tunas, L.
    Perez Lopez, M. E.
    Varela Ferreiro, S.
    Gonzalez Quintas, A. Q.
    Senin Estor, C.
    Cueva Banuelos, J. F.
    Hagen, C.
    Inglada-Perez, L.
    Pereiro, D.
    Calvo-Martinez, L.
    Carou, I.
    Iglesias Rey, L.
    Saenz de Miera, A.
    Garcia-Caballero, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S46 - S46
  • [33] Implementation of Oncotype Dx to Guide Chemotherapy Sparing for Women with Postmenopausal N1-3, ER-positive, HER-2-negative Breast Cancer
    Rajakumar, L.
    Glendenning, J.
    Hall, J.
    Burcombe, R.
    McCormick, G.
    Hegarty, G.
    Harper-Wynne, C.
    Brown, B.
    Moss, C.
    Thomas, C.
    Jyothirmayi, R.
    Osman, M.
    Nikiforidis, L.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 36 (04) : E111 - E111
  • [34] Sex Disparity Observed for Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score in Predicting Mortality Among Patients with Early Stage ER-Positive Breast Cancer
    Wang, Fei
    Reid, Sonya
    Zheng, Wei
    Pal, Tuya
    Meszoely, Ingrid
    Mayer, Ingrid A.
    Bailey, Christina E.
    Park, Ben Ho
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (01) : 101 - 109
  • [35] Implications of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment decisions in ER-positive early-stage breast cancer patients: experience of Kuwait Cancer Control Center
    Salah Fayaz
    Heba El-Sayed Eissa
    Gerges Attia Demian
    Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 32
  • [36] Implications of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment decisions in ER-positive early-stage breast cancer patients: experience of Kuwait Cancer Control Center
    Fayaz, Salah
    Eissa, Heba El-Sayed
    Demian, Gerges Attia
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [37] TREATMENT OF NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER
    LONG, D
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1991, 44 (02) : 448 - 448
  • [38] German multicentre decision impact study of Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) on adjuvant treatment in estrogen receptor positive (ER plus ) node negative (N0) and node positive (N plus ) early breast cancer
    Blohmer, J. -U.
    Kuehn, T.
    Rezai, M.
    Kuemmel, S.
    Warm, M.
    Eggemann, H.
    Friedrichs, K.
    Eiermann, W.
    BREAST, 2011, 20 : S46 - S46
  • [39] The impact of routine pathology review on treatment for node-negative breast cancer
    Kennecke, H. F.
    Speers, C.
    Gelmon, K. A.
    Olivotto, I.
    Hayes, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [40] Impact of Routine Pathology Review on Treatment for Node-Negative Breast Cancer
    Kennecke, Hagen F.
    Speers, Caroline H.
    Ennis, Catherine A.
    Gelmon, Karen
    Olivotto, Ivo A.
    Hayes, Malcolm
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (18) : 2227 - 2231