Remnant preservation does not affect accuracy of tibial tunnel positioning in single-bundle ACL reconstruction

被引:11
|
作者
Kosy, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Walmsley, Katie [1 ]
Gordon, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Heddon, Sadie, V [2 ]
Anaspure, Rahul [3 ]
Schranz, Peter J. [1 ]
Mandalia, Vipul, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaed Ctr, Exeter Knee Reconstruct Unit, Barrack Rd, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
[2] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, Res & Dev Dept, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, Radiol Dept, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Remnant preservation; Tibial tunnel position; Three-dimensional computer tomography; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PLACEMENT; 2ND-LOOK;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-020-06125-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Remnant preservation, in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, has potential biological advantages. However, graft positioning remains vital to functional outcome and the prevention of failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of tibial tunnel positioning in remnant preservation single-bundle hamstring reconstruction. Methods Fifty consecutive adult patients, with isolated ACL rupture, were recruited to a prospective study. Remnant preservation was performed in all cases where > 25% of the native ACL was present. Three-dimensional computer tomography was preformed 3-6 months post-operatively to assess tibial tunnel position (using a grid-based measurement). Accuracy and precision of this technique were assessed against published anatomical data in direct comparison with the group where remnant preservation could not be performed. Results Two patients withdrew following surgery. In the remaining groups (31 remnant preservation; 17 non-remnant preservation), no difference was demonstrated in tunnel position (40.4 +/- 6.7% (anterior-to-posterior) and 47.4 +/- 1.5% (medial-to-lateral) vs. 38.8 +/- 4.9% and 46.7 +/- 1.5%, respectively; n.s.), accuracy (6.1% vs. 4.8%; n.s.) or precision (3.9% vs. 2.8%; n.s.). Conclusions Remnant preservation can be safely performed without compromising tunnel position. Therefore, the potential benefits of this technique can be utilised, in clinical practice, without sacrificing the ability to optimize tibial tunnel positioning.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1163
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and single-bundle reconstruction with remnant pull-out suture
    Kim, Seong Hwan
    Jung, Young Bok
    Song, Min Ku
    Lee, Sang Hak
    Jung, Ho Joong
    Lee, Han Jun
    Jung, Hyoung Seok
    Siti, Hawa-Tahir
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (09) : 2085 - 2093
  • [22] The influence of femoral tunnel position in single-bundle ACL reconstruction on functional outcomes and return to sports
    Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes
    Felipe Fregni
    Kayleen Weaver
    André Pedrinelli
    Gilberto Luis Camanho
    Arnaldo José Hernandez
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 97 - 103
  • [23] The influence of femoral tunnel position in single-bundle ACL reconstruction on functional outcomes and return to sports
    Fernandes, Tiago Lazzaretti
    Fregni, Felipe
    Weaver, Kayleen
    Pedrinelli, Andre
    Camanho, Gilberto Luis
    Hernandez, Arnaldo Jose
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [24] Effect of tunnel position for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics in a porcine model
    Yuki Kato
    Sheila J. M. Ingham
    Scott Kramer
    Patrick Smolinski
    Akiyoshi Saito
    Freddie H. Fu
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2010, 18 : 2 - 10
  • [25] Anatomic single-bundle ACL surgery: consequences of tibial tunnel diameter and drill-guide angle on tibial footprint coverage
    H. Van der Bracht
    L. Verhelst
    B. Stuyts
    B. Page
    J. Bellemans
    P. Verdonk
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 1030 - 1039
  • [26] Editorial Commentary: ACL Reconstruction: Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle
    Lubowitz, James H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (06): : 1197 - 1198
  • [27] Tibial Spine Location Influences Tibial Tunnel Placement in Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Iriuchishima, Takanori
    Goto, Bunsei
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (03) : 294 - 298
  • [28] Anatomic single-bundle ACL surgery: consequences of tibial tunnel diameter and drill-guide angle on tibial footprint coverage
    Van der Bracht, H.
    Verhelst, L.
    Stuyts, B.
    Page, B.
    Bellemans, J.
    Verdonk, P.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (05) : 1030 - 1039
  • [29] Stability evaluation of single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction during navigated ACL reconstruction
    Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
    Tsuda, Eiichi
    Fukuda, Akira
    Tsukada, Harehiko
    Toh, Satoshi
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2008, 16 (02): : 77 - 83
  • [30] Systematic Review of Surgical Technique and Tunnel Target Points and Placement in Anatomical Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction
    Iriuchishima, Takanori
    Goto, Bunsei
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (14) : 1531 - 1538