Everolimus and Erlotinib as Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

被引:29
|
作者
Papadimitrakopoulou, Vassiliki A. [1 ]
Soria, Jean-Charles [2 ,3 ]
Jappe, Annette [4 ,5 ]
Jehl, Valentine [4 ,5 ]
Klimovsky, Judith [4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Bruce E. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Inst Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
[3] Univ Paris 11, Villejuif, France
[4] Novartis Pharmaceut, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, Florham Pk, NJ USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Dose-limiting toxicity; Erlotinib; Everolimus; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Phase I; RAPAMYCIN INHIBITOR EVEROLIMUS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS; MAMMALIAN TARGET; EGFR INHIBITORS; FOLLOW-UP; GEFITINIB; TRIAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; STAGE;
D O I
10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182614835
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib is an approved treatment for chemotherapy-refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because activated epidermal growth factor receptor signals through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, adding the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus to erlotinib may improve efficacy by blocking multiple components of the same pathway. We conducted a phase I study to determine feasible dosages of combination therapy with erlotinib and everolimus for previously treated metastatic or unresectable NSCLC. Methods: Participants had advanced NSCLC progressing after two or less previous chemotherapy regimens. Feasibility of daily/weekly everolimus plus daily erlotinib was determined using a 6 + 6 dose-escalation design based on the rate of dose-limiting toxicities. Antitumor activity was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors study. Results: Of the 94 patients enrolled, 90% had stage IV NSCLC, 19% never smoked, and 15% were current smokers. Eighty-nine patients experienced one or more adverse events possibly related to any study medication. The most common dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis (n = 5), rash (n = 4), and diarrhea (n = 3). Maximum tolerated doses were everolimus 5 mg per day or 50 mg per week plus erlotinib 150 mg per day. In daily everolimus cohorts (n = 74), nine patients achieved a complete/partial response and 28 had stable disease (median duration disease control, 9.3 months). In weekly everolimus cohorts (n = 20), no tumor response was observed; seven patients had stable disease (median duration, 9.6 months). Conclusions: Combination therapy with everolimus 5 mg per day or 50 mg per week and erlotinib 150 mg per day provided acceptable tolerability and disease control. A randomized phase II study evaluating this combination in comparison with erlotinib alone is complete and is being analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1601
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Second-line erlotinib for non-small-cell lung cancer
    Lorusso, Vito
    Cinieri, Saverio
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (04): : E141 - E142
  • [32] The Evaluation of E-Cadherin and Vimentin as Biomarkers of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Erlotinib as Second- or Third-line Therapy
    Richardson, Frank
    Young, G. David
    Sennello, Regina
    Wolf, Julie
    Argast, Gretchen M.
    Mercado, Peter
    Davies, Angela
    Epstein, David M.
    Wacker, Bret
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (02) : 537 - 552
  • [33] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ERLOTINIB VERSUS DOCETAXEL AS A SECOND- OR THIRD-LINE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN KOREA
    Kim, Y. G.
    Lee, E. K.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A514 - A514
  • [34] Second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Hann C.L.
    Brahmer J.R.
    [J]. Current Oncology Reports, 2006, 8 (4) : 243 - 247
  • [35] Phase II Study of Weekly Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel as Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Kotake, Mie
    Kuwako, Tomohito
    Imai, Hisao
    Tomizawa, Yoshio
    Kaira, Kyoichi
    Yoshii, Akihiro
    Ochiai, Mai
    Miura, Yosuke
    Osaki, Takashi
    Sakurai, Reiko
    Takei, Kousuke
    Minato, Koichi
    Saito, Ryusei
    [J]. CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 65 (1-2): : 21 - 28
  • [36] Adverse effects and associated costs with second- and third-line therapies for non-small cell lung cancer
    Ye, X.
    Darkow, T.
    Reyes, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [37] Retrospective Analysis of Third-Line and Fourth-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Asahina, Hajime
    Sekine, Ikuo
    Horinouchi, Hidehito
    Nokihara, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Noboru
    Kubota, Kaoru
    Tamura, Tomohide
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2012, 13 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [38] Safety profiles of erlotinib therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Hotta, Katsuyuki
    Kiura, Katsuyuki
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (07) : 991 - 997
  • [39] Second- or third-line treatment with erlotinib in EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer: Real-life data
    Debieuvre, D.
    Moreau, L.
    Coudert, M.
    Locher, C.
    Asselaine, B.
    Coetmeur, D.
    Dayen, C.
    Goupil, F.
    Martin, F.
    Brun, P.
    De Faverges, G.
    Hauss, P-A
    Gally, S.
    Yahia, B. Ben Hadj
    Grivauxd, M.
    [J]. REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2019, 36 (06) : 649 - 663
  • [40] Second-line erlotinib for non-small-cell lung cancer Reply
    Ciuleanu, Tudor
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (04): : E142 - E142