Everolimus and Erlotinib as Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

被引:29
|
作者
Papadimitrakopoulou, Vassiliki A. [1 ]
Soria, Jean-Charles [2 ,3 ]
Jappe, Annette [4 ,5 ]
Jehl, Valentine [4 ,5 ]
Klimovsky, Judith [4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Bruce E. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Inst Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
[3] Univ Paris 11, Villejuif, France
[4] Novartis Pharmaceut, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, Florham Pk, NJ USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Dose-limiting toxicity; Erlotinib; Everolimus; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Phase I; RAPAMYCIN INHIBITOR EVEROLIMUS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS; MAMMALIAN TARGET; EGFR INHIBITORS; FOLLOW-UP; GEFITINIB; TRIAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; STAGE;
D O I
10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182614835
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib is an approved treatment for chemotherapy-refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because activated epidermal growth factor receptor signals through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, adding the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus to erlotinib may improve efficacy by blocking multiple components of the same pathway. We conducted a phase I study to determine feasible dosages of combination therapy with erlotinib and everolimus for previously treated metastatic or unresectable NSCLC. Methods: Participants had advanced NSCLC progressing after two or less previous chemotherapy regimens. Feasibility of daily/weekly everolimus plus daily erlotinib was determined using a 6 + 6 dose-escalation design based on the rate of dose-limiting toxicities. Antitumor activity was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors study. Results: Of the 94 patients enrolled, 90% had stage IV NSCLC, 19% never smoked, and 15% were current smokers. Eighty-nine patients experienced one or more adverse events possibly related to any study medication. The most common dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis (n = 5), rash (n = 4), and diarrhea (n = 3). Maximum tolerated doses were everolimus 5 mg per day or 50 mg per week plus erlotinib 150 mg per day. In daily everolimus cohorts (n = 74), nine patients achieved a complete/partial response and 28 had stable disease (median duration disease control, 9.3 months). In weekly everolimus cohorts (n = 20), no tumor response was observed; seven patients had stable disease (median duration, 9.6 months). Conclusions: Combination therapy with everolimus 5 mg per day or 50 mg per week and erlotinib 150 mg per day provided acceptable tolerability and disease control. A randomized phase II study evaluating this combination in comparison with erlotinib alone is complete and is being analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1601
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Erlotinib Versus Docetaxel As Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Personalized Medicine
    Biswas, Bivas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (05) : 524 - 524
  • [2] Phase II Study of Docetaxel in Combination with Everolimus for Second- or Third-Line Therapy of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Ramalingam, Suresh S.
    Owonikoko, Taofeek K.
    Behera, Madhusmita
    Subramanian, Janakiraman
    Saba, Nabil F.
    Kono, Scott A.
    Gal, Anthony A.
    Sica, Gabriel
    Harvey, R. Donald
    Chen, Zhengjia
    Klass, Carmen M.
    Shin, Dong M.
    Fu, Haian
    Sun, Shi-yong R.
    Govindan, Ramaswamy
    Khuri, Fadlo R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 (03) : 369 - 372
  • [3] Erlotinib Versus Docetaxel As Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Personalized Medicine Reply
    Kawaguchi, Tomoya
    Ando, Masahiko
    Kubo, Akihito
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (05) : 526 - U205
  • [4] Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib Versus Docetaxel As Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial (DELTA)
    Kawaguchi, Tomoya
    Ando, Masahiko
    Asami, Kazuhiro
    Okano, Yoshio
    Fukuda, Masaaki
    Nakagawa, Hideyuki
    Ibata, Hidenori
    Kozuki, Toshiyuki
    Endo, Takeo
    Tamura, Atsuhisa
    Kamimura, Mitsuhiro
    Sakamoto, Kazuhiro
    Yoshimi, Michihiro
    Soejima, Yoshifumi
    Tomizawa, Yoshio
    Isa, Shun-ichi
    Takada, Minoru
    Saka, Hideo
    Kubo, Akihito
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (18) : 1902 - 1908
  • [5] Comparison of gefitinib and erlotinib efficacies as third-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Shao, Yu-Yun
    Shau, Wen-Yi
    Lin, Zhong-Zhe
    Chen, Ho-Min
    Kuo, Raymond
    Yang, James Chih-Hsin
    Lai, Mei-Shu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [6] Economic impact of second- and third-line erlotinib treatment of non small-cell lung cancer
    Chouaid, C.
    Moser, A.
    Coudray-Omnes, C.
    Vergnenegre, A.
    [J]. REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2008, 25 (09) : 1096 - 1103
  • [7] The Applicability of a Predictive Index for Second- and Third-Line Treatment of Unselected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients
    Wojas-Krawczyk, Kamila
    Krawczyk, Pawel
    Mlak, Radoslaw
    Kucharczyk, Tomasz
    Kowalski, Dariusz M.
    Krzakowski, Maciej
    Milanowski, Janusz
    [J]. RESPIRATION, 2011, 82 (04) : 341 - 350
  • [8] Treatment paradigms for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: first-, second-, and third-line
    Leighl, N. B.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 : S52 - S58
  • [9] Second- and Further-Line Therapy with Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Daily Clinical Practice
    Krainhoefer, Josephine
    Walther, Mario
    Steinert, Matthias
    Reissig, Angelika
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [10] Second- And More-Line Therapy With Erlotinib In Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer In Daily Clinical Practice
    Reissig, A.
    Krainhofer, J.
    Walther, M.
    Steinert, M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 189