A Retrospective Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Modified Abdominal High Uterosacral Colpopexy in the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse

被引:7
|
作者
Cunjian, Y. [1 ]
Li, L. [1 ]
Xiaowen, W. [1 ]
Shengrong, L. [1 ]
Hao, X. [1 ]
Xiangqiong, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Jinzhou 434000, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Uterosacral colpopexy; Uterine prolapse; Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q); VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; MANCHESTER; SUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1007/s12013-012-9376-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To evaluate the clinical value of a novel method for high uterosacral colpopexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse. Thirty-one cases with severe pelvic organ prolapse diagnosed by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system received a novel high sacral colpopexy method. Clinical parameters associated perioperative period and 12 months after surgery and complications were analyzed. A questionnaire survey on pelvic floor distress inventory and pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence and sexual function was implemented. Between January 2007 and June 2008, 31 patients successfully received a Modified Abdominal High Uterosacral Colpopexy. The mean operation time was 50 +/- A 15 min, and the average blood loss was 100 +/- A 20 mls. 28 Patients returned for a 1-year follow-up, and the average follow-up period was 14 +/- A 6 months. According to POP-Q system evaluation, the rate of operational success reached 100 %. There were no significant intraoperative and postoperative complications. A total of 31 responses on pelvic floor distress inventory short form questionnaire and 24 responses on pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire showed that there was statistical significant difference before and after the procedure. This novel, high uterosacral colpopexy method is a safe and effective method for the treatment of uterine prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 99
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse
    Wang, Qi
    Wu, Nengxiu
    Li, Ying
    Lin, Chaoqin
    Xu, Ying
    Chen, Xianjing
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (04) : 1273 - 1282
  • [22] LAPAROSCOPIC HIGH UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SACRAL COLPOPEXY FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Panico, Giovanni
    Caramazza, Daniela
    Lombisani, Andrea
    Mastrovito, Sara
    Arcieri, Martina
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 : S23 - S24
  • [23] Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs. Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case-Control Study
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Panico, Giovanni
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    Caramazza, Daniela
    Zaccoletti, Riccardo
    Marturano, Monia
    Granese, Roberta
    Arcieri, Martina
    Cianci, Stefano
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [24] Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall: the easier way to treat uterine prolapse
    Gang Chen
    Dabao Wu
    Weidong Zhao
    Weiping Hu
    Jia Li
    Bin Ling
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 887 - 891
  • [25] Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall: the easier way to treat uterine prolapse
    Chen, Gang
    Wu, Dabao
    Zhao, Weidong
    Hu, Weiping
    Li, Jia
    Ling, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (07) : 887 - 891
  • [26] High uterosacral vault suspension vs. abdominal sacrocolpopexy for enterocele and/or vaginal vault prolapse repair
    Descouvieres, C.
    Rondini, C.
    Wenzel, C.
    Morales, A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 : S53 - S53
  • [27] Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Mika S. Ohno
    Monica L. Richardson
    Eric R. Sokol
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27 : 233 - 237
  • [28] A modified laparoscopic abdominal wall hysteropexy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Li, Guang-Tai
    Zhang, Yun-He
    Li, Xiao-Fan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (02) : 1084 - 1085
  • [29] Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse: A retrospective case series report
    Rosenblatt, Peter L.
    Chelmow, David
    Ferzandi, Tanaz R.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) : 268 - 272
  • [30] Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Ohno, Mika S.
    Richardson, Monica L.
    Sokol, Eric R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (02) : 233 - 237