Peer assessment: judging the quality of students' work by comments rather than marks

被引：45

作者：

Davies, P ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Glamorgan, Sch Comp, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam, Wales

来源：

INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL | 2006年 / 43卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/14703290500467566

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

This paper reports the results of a study into the quality of peer feedback provided by students within a computerised peer-assessment environment. The study looks at the creation of a 'feedback index' that represents the quality of an essay based upon the feedback provided during a peer-marking process and identifies a significant positive correlation between this index and the average marks produced for an essay. The data produced are analysed in an attempt to ascertain whether specific groups of students, based upon their ability in developing an essay within this subject area, in general tend to mark and/or comment on their peers either too generously or too critically.

引用

下载

页码：69 / 82

页数：14

共 26 条

[21] Opening Pandora's Box: How Does Peer Assessment Affect EFL Students' Writing Quality?
Meletiadou, Eleni
LANGUAGES, 2021, 6 (03)
[22] Students' perceptions of a graduated scale used for self-assessment and peer-assessment of written work in pre-service physical education teacher education (PETE)
Lopez-Pastor, Victor M.
Perez-Pueyo, Angel
Barba, Jose J.
Lorente-Catalan, Eloisa
CULTURA CIENCIA Y DEPORTE, 2016, 11 (31): : 37 - 50
[23] Students' reception of peer assessment of group-work contributions: problematics in terms of race and gender emerging from a South African case study
Thondhlana, Gladman
Belluigi, Dina Zoe
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (07) : 1118 - 1131
[24] How well did our students match? A peer-validated quantitative assessment of medical school match success: the match quality score
Chakraborti, Chayan
Crowther, Jason E.
Koretz, Zachary A.
Kahn, Marc J.
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2019, 24 (01):
[25] The road to self-assessment: exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students' capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report
Yucel, Robyn
Bird, Fiona L.
Young, Jodie
Blanksby, Tania
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (08) : 971 - 986
[26] Can't bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work A comment on G. Madison and T. Soderlund: Comparisons of scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: Gender studies can do better
Lykke, Nina
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 117 (01) : 655 - 666

← 1 2 3 →