Peer assessment: judging the quality of students' work by comments rather than marks

被引：45
|
作者：
Davies, P [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Glamorgan, Sch Comp, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam, Wales
来源：
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL | 2006年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1080/14703290500467566
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
This paper reports the results of a study into the quality of peer feedback provided by students within a computerised peer-assessment environment. The study looks at the creation of a 'feedback index' that represents the quality of an essay based upon the feedback provided during a peer-marking process and identifies a significant positive correlation between this index and the average marks produced for an essay. The data produced are analysed in an attempt to ascertain whether specific groups of students, based upon their ability in developing an essay within this subject area, in general tend to mark and/or comment on their peers either too generously or too critically.
引用
收藏
页码：69 / 82
页数：14
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Judging words rather than journals or authors: a reminder that peer review continues after publication
    Erren, T. C.
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 100 (12) : 799 - 800
  • [2] Using peer review to distribute group work marks equitably between medical students
    Cook, Alex R.
    Hartman, Mikael
    Luo, Nan
    Sng, Judy
    Fong, Ngan Phoon
    Lim, Wei Yen
    Chen, Mark I-Cheng
    Wong, Mee Lian
    Rajaraman, Natarajan
    Lee, Jeannette Jen-Mai
    Koh, Gerald Choon-Huat
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 17
  • [3] Using peer review to distribute group work marks equitably between medical students
    Alex R Cook
    Mikael Hartman
    Nan Luo
    Judy Sng
    Ngan Phoon Fong
    Wei Yen Lim
    Mark I-Cheng Chen
    Mee Lian Wong
    Natarajan Rajaraman
    Jeannette Jen-Mai Lee
    Gerald Choon-Huat Koh
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 17
  • [4] Peer and self-assessment in engineering students' group work
    Kommula, Venkata P.
    Uziak, Jacek
    Tunde Oladiran, M.
    [J]. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2010, 8 (01): : 56 - 60
  • [5] PEER REVIEW BASED EVALUATION IN TEAM WORK: STUDENTS' ASSESSMENT
    Martinez-Sala, R.
    Molina-Mateo, J.
    Tort-Ausina, I.
    Meseguer-Duenas, J. M.
    [J]. ICERI2015: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2015, : 980 - 985
  • [6] Collaborating or fighting for the marks? Students' experiences of group work assessment in the creative arts
    Orr, Susan
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (03) : 301 - 313
  • [7] Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills
    Tijs Rotsaert
    Ernesto Panadero
    Tammy Schellens
    [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2018, 33 : 75 - 99
  • [8] USING PEER-ASSESSMENT TO GENERATE HIGH-QUALITY AND PROXIMATE FEEDBACK AND FEED-FORWARD ON STUDENTS'WORK
    McMahon, T.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2010), 2010, : 3422 - 3423
  • [9] Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students' perceptions about peer assessment skills
    Rotsaert, Tijs
    Panadero, Ernesto
    Schellens, Tammy
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2018, 33 (01) : 75 - 99
  • [10] Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work
    Julia H. Kaufman
    Christian D. Schunn
    [J]. Instructional Science, 2011, 39 : 387 - 406
123