Barrier Effect of a New Topical Agent on Damaged Esophageal Mucosa: Experimental Study on an ex vivo Swine Model

被引:4
|
作者
Salaroli, Roberta [1 ]
Ventrella, Domenico [1 ]
Bernardini, Chiara [1 ]
Elmi, Alberto [1 ]
Zannoni, Augusta [1 ,2 ]
Bacci, Maria Laura [1 ,2 ]
Forni, Monica [1 ,2 ]
Calanni, Fiorella [3 ]
Ferrieri, Antonella [4 ]
Baldi, Fabio [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Vet Med Sci, Via Tolara 50, I-40064 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Hlth Sci & Technol Interdept Ctr Ind Res, Bologna, Italy
[3] Alfasigma, Preclin Res Dept, Bologna, Italy
[4] Alfasigma, Div Clin Res, Dept Res & Dev, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Bologna, Ctr Study Dis Esophagus, Ravenna, Italy
[6] Grp Villa Maria Care & Res, Ravenna, Italy
关键词
bioadhesion; Evans blue dye; EBD; animal model; esophagus; gastroesophageal reflux disease; GERD; MANAGEMENT; INTEGRITY; ALGINATE;
D O I
10.2147/CEG.S269568
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: AL2106 is a new medical device based on a mixture of chondroitin sulphate in a xyloglucan and glycerol solution made to maximize its bioadhesive capability to the esophageal mucosa. The aim of the present study was twofold to evaluate the AL2106 protective effect on the esophageal mucosa when exposed to an acidic solution mimicking gastric reflux and to assess the resilience of this effect to saline washing. Materials and Methods: A porcine ex vivo model was used and the effects of the new medical device were compared to a sodium alginate suspension (SAS) already present on the market which was assumed as reference. Mucosal damage was induced in 19 porcine esophagi by perfusion with an acidic solution added with pepsin, and Evans blue dye (EBD) tissue uptake was used as an indicator of mucosal permeability. The EBD penetration, expressed as EBD mu g/g of dry tissue, was assessed in specimens of untreated damaged mucosa and in specimens treated with AL2106 or SAS. The same evaluation was carried out after washing with normal saline. Results: Both topical agents tested significantly reduced the EBD uptake by more than 60% (AL2106 8.4 +/- 4.5, SAS 3.6 +/- 2.7 vs control 23.2 +/- 13.1, p<0.01). The saline washing did not cause any significant reduction in the protective effect of AL2106 (8.6 +/- 5.9), while it significantly reduced that of SAS (5.9 +/- 4.3, p<0.05). Conclusion: The new AL2106 medical device showed a good barrier effect against a reflux-like damaging solution and preserved this effect after the mucosal washing test, thus suggesting its possible relevance for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 576
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barrier effect of Esoxx((R)) on esophageal mucosal damage: experimental study on ex-vivo swine model
    Di Simone, Massimo P.
    Baldi, Fabio
    Vasina, Valentina
    Scorrano, Fabrizio
    Bacci, Maria Laura
    Ferrieri, Antonella
    Poggioli, Gilberto
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 5 : 103 - 107
  • [2] Radiofrequency Ablation of Spine An Experimental Study in an Ex Vivo Bovine and In Vivo Swine Model for Feasibility in Spine Tumor
    You, Nam Kyu
    Lee, Hye Young
    Shin, Dong Ah
    Choi, Gwi Hyun
    Yi, Seong
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Yoon, Do Heum
    Park, Jon
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (18) : E1121 - E1127
  • [3] Development of an ex vivo human skin barrier repair model for testing topical formulations
    Berkers, T.
    van Dijk, L.
    van Smeden, J.
    Bouwstra, J.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 135 : S48 - S48
  • [4] An ex-vivo oral mucosa infection model for the evaluation of the topical activity of antifungal agents
    Ohnemus, U.
    Willers, C.
    Bubenheim, M.
    Horstkotte, M. A.
    Houdek, P.
    Fischer, F.
    Schmage, P.
    Moll, I.
    Brandner, J. M.
    MYCOSES, 2008, 51 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [5] An ex-vivo oral mucosa infection - model for the evaluation of the topical activity of antifungal agents
    Ohnemus, U.
    Willers, C.
    Bubenheim, M.
    Horstkotte, M. A.
    Houdek, P.
    Moll, I.
    Brandner, J. M.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03) : 270 - 270
  • [6] ADHESION AND MUCOSAL EFFECT OF LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS GG IN COLONIC MUCOSA EVALUATED IN-VIVO AND IN AN EXPERIMENTAL EX-VIVO MODEL: A PROOF THE CONCEPT STUDY
    Pagnini, C.
    Martorelli, M.
    Lanini, C.
    Rizzatti, G.
    Corleto, V. D.
    Menasci, F.
    Angeletti, S.
    Di Giulio, E.
    Delle Fave, G.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2015, 47 : E93 - E93
  • [7] On the ability of experimental impact measures to predict tooth injuries in an ex vivo swine model
    Houg, Kathryn P.
    Adanty, Kevin
    MacGillivray, Samantha R.
    McAllister, Lowell
    Levin, Liran
    Alexiou, Maria
    Graf, Daniel
    Romanyk, Dan L.
    Dennison, Christopher R.
    DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 37 (03) : 464 - 473
  • [8] Development of an Experimental Ex Vivo Wound Model to Evaluate Antimicrobial Efficacy of Topical Formulations
    Andersson, Madelene A.
    Madsen, Lone Bruhn
    Schmidtchen, Artur
    Puthia, Manoj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (09)
  • [9] An Ex Vivo Porcine Nasal Mucosa Explants Model to Study MRSA Colonization
    Tulinski, Pawel
    Fluit, Ad C.
    van Putten, Jos P. M.
    de Bruin, Alain
    Glorieux, Sarah
    Wagenaar, Jaap A.
    Duim, Birgitta
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [10] Ex vivo construction of a novel model of bioengineered bladder mucosa: A preliminary study
    Jaimes-Parra, Boris D.
    Valle-Diaz de la Guardia, Francisco
    Arrabal-Polo, Miguel A.
    Herrera-Imbroda, Bernardo
    Lara, Maria F.
    Machuca-Santa-Cruz, Francisco-Javier
    Campos, Antonio
    Alaminos, Miguel
    Crespo, Pascual V.
    Garzon, Ingrid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 85 - 92