Effectiveness of Reoperations for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Although several options are available to address adjacent segment disease (ASD), the most effective surgical treatment has not been determined. In addition, it is important to subdivide ASD into stenosis with or without instability to determine if a decompression alone vs an extension of fusion is necessary. A systematic search of multiple medical reference databases was conducted for studies on surgical treatment of ASD. The primary outcome measures used were radiographic and clinical success rates. Meta-analysis was completed to determine effect summary values, 95% confidence intervals, and Q statistic and I-2 values, using the random effects model for heterogeneity. The search yielded 662 studies, of which 657 were excluded. A total of 5 (level IV) studies with a total of 118 patients were included in this review. In 2 studies (46 patients), stenosis without instability was the indication for reoperation for ASD. However, extension of fusion was the modality of choice for the treatment of ASD in all studies. Overall clinical improvement (in back and/or leg pain scores) was noted in 71.3% of patients (95% confidence interval, 37.4-100), while radiographic fusion was noted in 89.3% of patients (95% confidence interval, 51.2-100). Following reoperation for ASD, revision surgery rates ranged from 4.5% to 23.1% at last clinical follow-up. There is variability in the clinical improvement following lumbar fusion for ASD. In addition, little literature exists regarding the optimal treatment options for patients with ASD for stenosis with or without instability.