Dependability validation, evaluation and testing of safety-critical aerospace systems

被引:0
|
作者
Carreira, J [1 ]
Costa, D [1 ]
机构
[1] IPN, P-3030199 Coimbra, Portugal
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Computing systems used in space are required to operate unattended for large periods and survive in the harsh space environment, subject to extremely hostile conditions such as heavy doses of radiation from diverse origins. Radiation, and particularly hits of pro-tons or heavy-ions in space may cause single-event up-sets in electronics, result in transient faults of the computing equipment onboard and compromise its proper function and mission success. Apart from extremely careful design and implementation, safety-critical aerospace systems must incorporate fault tolerance mechanisms in order to recover from faults that inevitably occur in space. The problem of evaluating and validating these mechanisms in the ground in order to qualify them for space missions is becoming increasingly important due to the increasing complexity of both hardware and software used in space missions. The experimental evaluation and validation through fault injection is one approach that has achieved quite success in the past, but some factors impaired traditional fault injection from being used extensively in a broad range of mission architectures. This paper presents, Reception, a technology for evaluating and validating fault tolerance mechanisms, and overall software testing in safety critical systems. Xception injects faults in processor internal functional units, memory, and in general in any device accessible to software. Xception is totally build in software, provides a flexible and powerful set of triggers, is low-intrusive, and may be easily ported to a wide spectrum of systems, thus being an interesting technology for use in safety-critical aerospace systems.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 271
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cybersecurity in safety-critical systems
    Walker, Alastair
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2018, 30 (05)
  • [32] SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS - INTRODUCTION
    BENNETT, P
    [J]. COMPUTING & CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1994, 5 (01): : 5 - 5
  • [33] Virtual testing in a safety-critical environment
    Dullaway, NJ
    Morris, AJ
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY, 1996, : 213 - 218
  • [34] EVALUATION OF SAFETY-CRITICAL SOFTWARE
    PARNAS, DL
    VANSCHOUWEN, AJ
    KWAN, SP
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1990, 33 (06) : 636 - 648
  • [35] The ethics of safety-critical systems
    Bowen, J
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2000, 43 (04) : 91 - 97
  • [36] Safety-critical systems design
    Douglass, Bruce Powel
    [J]. Electronic Engineering (London), 1998, 70 (862):
  • [37] Testing concepts in Safety-Critical Development
    Taliga, Miklos
    Steiner-Komoroczki, Henriette
    [J]. 2018 18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (CINTI), 2018, : 105 - 108
  • [38] An approach for testing safety-critical software
    Li, WW
    Xu, ZW
    Jin, Y
    [J]. NINTH GREAT LAKES SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 180 - 183
  • [39] Software testing for safety-critical applications
    Wang, LF
    Tan, KC
    [J]. IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT MAGAZINE, 2005, 8 (02) : 38 - 47
  • [40] Safety-critical systems argumentation and validation in computational modeling for drug design
    Ghetiu, Teodor
    Polack, Fiona
    Bown, James
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 22 : S29 - S29