Chest wall perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction after breast conservation surgery: an additional oncoplastic surgical option

被引:18
|
作者
Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar [1 ]
Shakya, Sudip Ratna [1 ]
Nigam, Shashank [1 ]
Sharma, Abhishek [1 ]
Datta, Soumitra S. [2 ,3 ]
Ahmed, Rosina [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Med Ctr, Dept Breast Oncosurg, Kolkata 700156, India
[2] Tata Med Ctr, Dept Palliat Care & Psychooncol, Kolkata 700156, India
[3] UCL, Inst Clin Trials & Methodol, MRC Clin Trials Unit, London WC1V 6LJ, England
来源
ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
breast cancer; oncoplastic breast surgery; chest wall perforator flap; CONSERVING SURGERY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; STAGE-I; IRRADIATION; MASTECTOMY; MARGINS; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.3332/ecancer.2020.1073
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Partial breast reconstruction using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) is a recent option used by breast surgeons, mainly for lateral quadrant defects with a relatively large volume of excision. We report a single-centre experience of CWPF with surgery details, complications, re-excision, aesthetic and oncological outcomes. This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients who had undergone breast conservation surgery (BCS) plus CWPF reconstruction. All variables were recorded prospectively in the institutional database. A survey was done to analyse patient satisfaction at about 6 months after completion of radiotherapy. Forty patients had CWPF based reconstruction in 3 years. 57.5 % of patients had lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap, 5% had lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap, 27.5% had combined LICAP plus LTAP and 10% patients had anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) flap. Tumour excision cavity defect was of the lateral quadrant in 82.5%, central quadrant in 10% and medial quadrant in 7.5% of patients. The margin was positive for five patients, out of which four required cavity shave and one had a mastectomy. One patient had complete flap loss, and two patients developed surgical site infection. 96% of patients were satisfied with the scar, and 88% were happy with the treated breast in comparison to the opposite breast. 92% were comfortable going out in public and felt that in retrospect their decision not to have a mastectomy was correct. With a median follow up of 18 (10, 22) months, one patient died, and four had recurrences. CWPF may be used for partial breast reconstruction in the small non-ptotic breast with excellent outcome and high patient satisfaction scores.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate partial breast reconstruction with chest wall perforator flaps
    Fujimoto, H.
    Nagashima, T.
    Sangai, T.
    Hayama, S.
    Ishigami, E.
    Masuda, T.
    Nakagawa, A.
    Teranaka, R.
    Otsuka, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S80 - S81
  • [2] Lateral chest wall perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction
    Orabi, Ahmed
    Youssef, Mina M. G.
    Manie, Tamer M.
    Shaalan, Mohamed
    Hashem, Tarek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 34 (01)
  • [3] Lateral chest wall perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction
    Ahmed Orabi
    Mina M G Youssef
    Tamer M. Manie
    Mohamed Shaalan
    Tarek Hashem
    [J]. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 34
  • [4] Pushing the Boundaries of Pedicled Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
    Laroiya, Ishita
    Tan, Melissa
    Zafar, Shaista
    Shetty, Geeta
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [5] Chest wall perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction: Surgical outcomes from a multicenter study
    Soumian, Soni
    Parmeshwar, Rishikesh
    Chandarana, Mihir
    Marla, Sekhar
    Narayanan, Sankaran
    Shetty, Geeta
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2020, 47 (02): : 153 - 159
  • [6] Chest wall perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction after conservative surgery: Prospective analysis of safety and reliability
    Pinto, Tiago Russell
    Mora, Henrique
    Peleteiro, Barbara
    Magalhaes, Andre
    Goncalves, Diana
    Fougo, Jose Luis
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2023, 51
  • [7] The Results of Surveillance Imaging After Breast Conservation Surgery and Partial Breast Reconstruction With Chest Wall Perforator Flaps; A Qualitative Analysis Compared With Standard Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer
    Hu, Jesse
    Cuffolo, Giulio
    Parulekar, Vaishali
    Chan, Victoria
    Tenovici, Alexandra
    Roy, Pankaj G.
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2019, 19 (03) : E422 - E427
  • [8] Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction
    Schaverien, Mark, V
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    Caudle, Abigail S.
    Smith, Benjamin D.
    Hwang, Rosa F.
    Robb, Geoffrey L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (01): : 14 - 27
  • [9] Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction
    Garreffa, Emanuele
    Agrawal, Amit
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (06): : 1057E - 1058E
  • [10] Chest wall perforator flap for partial breast reconstruction: Value addition for oncoplastic techniques
    Agrawal, Sanjit
    Nigam, Shashank
    Agarwal, Pooja
    Ahmed, Rosina
    Datta, Soumitra Shankar
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 118 - 118