Traditional Knowledge, Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity Conservation: Critical Issues and Key Challenges

被引:0
|
作者
Damodaran, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Bangalore 560076, Karnataka, India
来源
关键词
SW generis; bioprospecting; valuation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Based on a survey of the major national and international initiatives undertaken to protect Traditional Knowledge (TK) since 1990s, the paper states that the task of reconciling TRIPS with CBD and other related TK laws is fraught with difficulties. After examining various IPRs in relation to TK, the paper argues that there are clear limits to which former, call accommodate the latter especially when it comes to positive protection of TK and related cultural expressions. The main argument in this paper is that sui generis legislations are more effective for the protection of TK and related cultural expressions. A sui generis legislation that views TK as a composite resource, having both economic and cultural features has a better prospect of ensuring protection of TK, besides enabling benefit sharing. By having international regulations that harmonize protection measures, it is guaranteed that national efforts at protection are not wasted due to absence of reciprocity.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 513
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] International Law and Indigenous Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Plant Biodiversity, and Traditional Medicine
    Dent, Chris
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 (02)
  • [22] ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES, DIVISION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND BENEFITS: biodiversity conservation and patent rights
    Dias Rolim Visentin, Maria Alice
    [J]. VEREDAS DO DIREITO, 2012, 9 (17): : 163 - 179
  • [23] Biotechnology and developing countries: the struggle over intellectual property rights and implications for biodiversity conservation
    Janni, O
    [J]. REGULATION OF AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, : 119 - 126
  • [24] Intellectual property rights, trade and biodiversity.
    Kelly, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2000, 76 (04) : 878 - 878
  • [25] Patenting life?Biodiversity and intellectual property rights
    Ghate Utkarsh
    [J]. Resonance, 2001, 6 (2) : 51 - 56
  • [26] Biodiversity and intellectual property rights: Conflict or synergy
    Sharma, Rahul
    Madhusoodanan, Lavanya
    Soni, Patrika
    Dubey, Amit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 2022, 25 (02): : 460 - 472
  • [27] Traditional Knowledge, Intellectual Property and International Negotiations: New IP Rights' Gestation?
    Guevara Fernandez, Ernesto
    [J]. PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL, 2012, (15): : 204 - 226
  • [28] Challenges from intellectual property rights
    Greger, JL
    [J]. ACADEMIC FREEDOM ON TRIAL: 100 YEARS OF SIFTING AND WINNOWING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON, 1998, : 279 - 282
  • [29] Intellectual property rights on biological resources: Benefiting from biodiversity and people's knowledge
    Utkarsh, G
    Gadgil, M
    Rao, PRS
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 1999, 77 (11): : 1418 - 1425
  • [30] Key intellectual property issues in nanotechnology
    Barron, Russell J.
    Rutt, J. Steven
    [J]. DIGITAL FABRICATION 2006, FINAL PROGRAM AND PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 42 - 45