Use of Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning in Maritime Security Assessment

被引:161
|
作者
Yang, Z. L. [1 ]
Wang, J. [1 ]
Bonsall, S. [1 ]
Fang, Q. G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Engn, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
[2] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Merchant Marine Coll, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Evidential reasoning; fuzzy logic; maritime security assessment; sensitivity analysis; SAFETY ANALYSIS; SETS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01158.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Over the last few years, there has been a growing international recognition that the security performance of the maritime industry needs to be reviewed on an urgent basis. A large number of optional maritime security control measures have been proposed through various regulations and publications in the post-9/11 era. There is a strong need for a sound and generic methodology, which is capable of taking into account multiple selection criteria such as the cost effectiveness of the measures based on reasonable security assessment. The use of traditional risk assessment and decision-making approaches to deal with potential terrorism threats in a maritime security area reveals two major challenges. They are lack of capability of analyzing security in situations of high-level uncertainty and lack of capability of processing diverse data in a utility form suitable as input to a risk inference mechanism. To deal with such difficulties, this article proposes a subjective security-based assessment and management framework using fuzzy evidential reasoning (ER) approaches. Consequently, the framework can be used to assemble and process subjective risk assessment information on different aspects of a maritime transport system from multiple experts in a systematic way. Outputs of this model can also provide decisionmakers with a transparent tool to evaluate maritime security policy options for a specific scenario in a cost-effective manner.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 120
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vulnerability assessment of strait/canals in maritime transportation using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach
    Jiang, Meizhi
    Wang, Benmei
    Hao, Yingjun
    Chen, Shijun
    Lu, Jing
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2023, 43 (09) : 1795 - 1810
  • [2] Fuzzy matching and evidential reasoning
    Folkesson, M
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDING, 2003, 2711 : 267 - 278
  • [3] Condition assessment of water mains using fuzzy evidential reasoning
    Najjaran, H
    Sadiq, R
    Rajani, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOL 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 3466 - 3471
  • [4] Fuzzy evidential reasoning to risk assessment of ship navigation system
    Xi, Yongtao
    Fang, Quangen
    Hu, Shenping
    Li, Xudong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2007, 2 : 653 - 658
  • [5] Assessment as Evidential Reasoning
    Gorin, Joana
    [J]. TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2014, 116 (11):
  • [6] Assessment of E-Commerce security using AHP and evidential reasoning
    Zhang, Yajuan
    Deng, Xinyang
    Wei, Daijun
    Deng, Yong
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (03) : 3611 - 3623
  • [7] Evidential Reasoning Based on the Fuzzy Beliefs
    Gao, Jian
    Yan, Jingjing
    Duanmu, Zuyun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCSIT 2010), VOL 6, 2010, : 103 - 107
  • [8] Reasoning with conceptual graphs and evidential networks for multi-entity maritime threat assessment
    Kowalski, Pawel
    Jousselme, Anne-Laure
    [J]. 2022 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION 2022), 2022,
  • [9] The Use of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values in Rule-Base Evidential Reasoning
    Dymova, Ludmila
    Sevastjanov, Pavel
    Tkacz, Kamil
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, PT I, 2013, 7894 : 247 - 258
  • [10] PROBABILISTIC REASONING IN EVIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT
    AITKEN, CGG
    GAMMERMAN, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1989, 29 (05): : 303 - 316