NICE's social value judgements about equity in health and health care

被引:28
|
作者
Shah, Koonal K. [1 ,2 ]
Cookson, Richard [3 ]
Culyer, Anthony J. [3 ,4 ]
Littlejohns, Peter [5 ]
机构
[1] Off Hlth Econ, London SW1E 6QT, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Kings Coll London, Div Hlth & Social Res, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
CLINICAL EXCELLENCE; NATIONAL INSTITUTE; ACCOUNTABILITY; REASONABLENESS; RESCUE; LIFE; RULE;
D O I
10.1017/S1744133112000096
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) routinely publishes details of the evidence and reasoning underpinning its recommendations, including its social value judgements (SVJs). To date, however, NICE's SVJs relating to equity in the distribution of health and health care have been less specific and systematic than those relating to cost-effectiveness in the pursuit of improved total population health. NICE takes a pragmatic, case-based approach to developing its principles of SVJ, drawing on the cumulative experience of its advisory bodies in making decisions that command respect among its broad range of stakeholders. This paper aims to describe the SVJs about equity in health and health care that NICE has hitherto used to guide its decision making. To do this, we review both the general SVJs reported in NICE guidance on methodology and the case-specific SVJs reported in NICE guidance about particular health care technologies and public health interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 165
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条