Validation of a Combi Oven Cooking Method for Preparation of Chicken Breast Meat for Quality Assessment

被引:29
|
作者
Zhuang, H. [1 ]
Savage, E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Serv, Qual & Safety Assessment Res Unit, USDA, Russell Res Ctr, Athens, GA 30604 USA
关键词
chicken breast; combi oven; commercial oven; sensory descriptive profile; water cooking;
D O I
10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00931.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Quality assessment results of cooked meat can be significantly affected by sample preparation with different cooking techniques. A combi oven is a relatively new cooking technique in the U. S. market. However, there was a lack of published data about its effect on quality measurements of chicken meat. Broiler breast fillets deboned at 24-h postmortem were cooked with one of the 3 methods to the core temperature of 80 degrees C. Cooking methods were evaluated based on cooking operation requirements, sensory profiles, Warner-Bratzler (WB) shear and cooking loss. Our results show that the average cooking time for the combi oven was 17 min compared with 31 min for the commercial oven method and 16 min for the hot water method. The combi oven did not result in a significant difference in the WB shear force values, although the cooking loss of the combi oven samples was significantly lower than the commercial oven and hot water samples. Sensory profiles of the combi oven samples did not significantly differ from those of the commercial oven and hot water samples. These results demonstrate that combi oven cooking did not significantly affect sensory profiles and WB shear force measurements of chicken breast muscle compared to the other 2 cooking methods. The combi oven method appears to be an acceptable alternative for preparing chicken breast fillets in a quality assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:S424 / S430
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative efficacy of microwave oven for cooking of chicken meat
    Mendiratta, SK
    Kumar, S
    Keshri, RC
    Sharma, BD
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1998, 78 (07): : 827 - 829
  • [2] Assessment of lamb meat quality in two cooking methods: Water bath versus oven cooking
    Leal, Mariana da S.
    Baldassini, Welder A.
    Torres, Rodrigo de N. S.
    Curi, Rogerio A.
    Pereira, Guilherme L.
    Chardulo, Luis Artur L.
    Santos, Rafael F.
    Meirelles, Paulo R. L.
    Costa, Ciniro
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2023, 229
  • [3] Validation of feasibility and quality of chicken breast meat cooked under various water-cooking conditions
    Chumngoen, Wanwisa
    Chen, Hsin-Yi
    Tan, Fa-Jui
    [J]. ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2016, 87 (12) : 1536 - 1544
  • [4] Changes in chicken meat proteins during microwave and electric oven cooking
    Taskiran, Melike
    Olum, Emine
    Candogan, Kezban
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION, 2020, 44 (02)
  • [5] Quality of chicken breast meat cooked in a pilot-scale radio frequency oven
    Kirmaci, Bilal
    Singh, Rakesh K.
    [J]. INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 14 : 77 - 84
  • [6] Quality of chicken patties as influenced by microwave and conventional oven cooking
    Nath, RL
    Mahapatra, CM
    Kondaiah, N
    Singh, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE, 1996, 33 (02): : 162 - 164
  • [7] SLOW COOKER VS OVEN PREPARATION OF MEAT LOAVES AND CHICKEN
    PETERS, CR
    SINWELL, DD
    VANDUYNE, FO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1983, 83 (04) : 430 - 435
  • [8] Combined effects of sous-vide cooking conditions on meat and sensory quality characteristics of chicken breast meat
    Park, C. H.
    Lee, B.
    Oh, E.
    Kim, Y. S.
    Choi, Y. M.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2020, 99 (06) : 3286 - 3291
  • [9] Quality assessment of cooked chicken breast meat at different storage temperatures
    Pizato, S.
    Cortez-Vega, W. R.
    Prentice, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FOOD RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (01): : 143 - 154
  • [10] Effect of Ultrasonic Thawing Method on Quality Characteristics of Chicken Breast Meat
    Zhang, Xin
    Song, Lei
    Gao, Tian
    Zhang, Lin
    Jiang, Yun
    Li, Jiaolong
    Gao, Feng
    Zhou, Guanghong
    [J]. Shipin Kexue/Food Science, 2018, 39 (05): : 135 - 140