QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ERAMIS NETWORK: THE ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS

被引:0
|
作者
Lujan-Mora, S. [1 ]
Milosz, M. [1 ]
Adam, J. M. [1 ]
Merceron, A. [1 ]
Toppinen, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Alicante, Spain
关键词
quality; assurance; assessment; curricular; reform; international; project;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
During the last few years, Russian, Kazakh, and Kyrgyz higher education systems have been reformed and are progressively evolving within the context of Bologna Process (European Higher Education Area), towards a common higher education framework. The opening of Russian, Kazakh and Kyrgyz universities has been encouraged by many international projects, notably European ones. In the beginning of 2010, the European Tempus project European-Russian-Central Asian Network of Master Degrees "Informatics as a Second Competence" (ERAMIS) started to set up a network between a group of universities from Europe, Russia and Central Asia. The members of the project are: five universities from Europe (Finland, France, Germany, Poland, and Spain), four universities from Russian Federation, three universities from Kazakhstan, two universities from Kyrgyzstan, and three enterprises from Russian Federation, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan. The main objective of this project is to create a network of master degrees in computer science as a second competence intended for specialists in social sciences, exact sciences, and engineering. The objective of the master degree is to give specialists coming from other disciplines, a training enabling them to master computer techniques and programming languages in order to create, develop, manage and maintain new software tools for their specific domains. One of the secondary objectives of the project is to develop an own culture of quality assurance between the partners. In order to achieve this objective, the Monitoring, Evaluation and Improvement Committee (MEIC) was established inside the project. The main task of this committee is to provide quality control and monitor the activities and outcomes of the ERAMIS project. The MEIC has established a transparent quality assurance system mainly based on the guidelines from the "Council Recommendation of 24 September 1998 on European Cooperation in Quality Assurance in Higher Education (98/561/EC)". Due to the international and heterogeneous nature of this project (14 universities from 8 countries), one of the most difficult tasks has been to develop comparable criteria and methodologies. In this paper, we present our quality assurance system, although the assessment of students is the main topic because it is one of the most important elements of our quality assurance method. Student assessment procedures are designed to measure the achievement of the intended learning outcomes. Assessment also provides valuable information for universities about the effectiveness of teaching and learners' support. Our assessment procedure allows the partners to compare the results between subjects, programmes, and universities, and leads to an exchange of experiences of best practices.
引用
收藏
页码:1777 / 1786
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Students as Partners in Quality Assurance: Implications for Higher Education
    Umar, Mwebesa
    Asraf, Ratnawati Mohd
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (04) : 2239 - 2242
  • [32] Quality assurance in assessment: An introduction to this special issue
    Sluijsmans, Dominique M. A.
    Struyven, Katrien
    [J]. STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2014, 43 : 1 - 4
  • [33] Quality assurance of radiotherapy and its clinical assessment
    Inoue, T
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 32 (12) : 497 - 505
  • [34] Quality assurance and assessment practices in translation and interpreting
    Liu, Yanmeng
    [J]. TRANSLATION & INTERPRETING-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETING, 2021, 13 (01): : 139 - 142
  • [35] QUALITY ASSURANCE OF REGISTRIES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Mandeville, Kate L.
    Valentic, Maja
    Ivankovic, Damir
    Pristas, Ivan
    Long, Jae
    Patrick, Hannah E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (04) : 360 - 367
  • [36] QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE - THE PERFORMANCE-REVIEW ALTERNATIVE
    FARRINGTON, JF
    FELCH, WC
    HARE, RL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1980, 303 (03): : 154 - 156
  • [37] Quality assurance issues in the teacher-based assessment of students with literacy difficulties for examination access arrangements
    McMurray, Sharon
    O'Callaghan, Paul
    McVeigh, Claire
    [J]. DYSLEXIA, 2018, 24 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [38] Quality assurance and recommendations for quality assessment of screening colonoscopy in Belgium
    Macken, E.
    Moreels, T.
    Pelckmans, P.
    Peeters, M.
    Baert, D.
    Reynaert, H.
    Delooze, D.
    Vannoote, J.
    Hiele, M.
    Coenegrachts, J. L.
    Hoste, P.
    Van Cutsem, E.
    D'Haens, G.
    [J]. ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2009, 72 (01): : 17 - 25
  • [40] Quality Assurance and quality assessment of health care telematic technologies
    Kolitsi, Z
    Koutsouris, D
    Pavlopoulos, S
    Pallikarakis, N
    [J]. MEDICAL INFORMATICS EUROPE '97: PARTS A & B, 1997, 43 : 766 - 770