High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter European Clinical Study

被引:242
|
作者
Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Al-Kaisy, Adnan [2 ]
Smet, Iris [1 ]
Palmisani, Stefano [2 ]
Smith, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] AZ Nikolaas, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, St Niklaas, Belgium
[2] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Pain Management & Neuromodulat Ctr, London SE1 9RT, England
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2013年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
axial back pain; failed back surgery syndrome; high-frequency stimulation; low back pain; spinal cord stimulation; SURGERY SYNDROME; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12006
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this prospective, open-label, multicenter European clinical trial was to quantify the efficacy and safety of a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system that utilizes high-frequency (up to 10kHz) waveforms, which do not produce paresthesia, for the treatment of chronic, intractable pain of the back and/or limbs. Material and Methods Eighty-three patients, with significant back pain, were recruited for a trial of high-frequency stimulation through two percutaneous eight-contact epidural leads. Patients' pain ratings, disability, sleep disturbances, and satisfaction, as well as complication rates, were assessed for up to six months. Results After a trial period, 88% (72 out of 82) of patients reported a significant improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) scores and underwent permanent implantation of the high-frequency SCS system. Mean back pain VAS of 8.4 was reduced to 2.7 at six months (p< 0.001). Mean leg pain VAS of 5.4 was reduced to 1.4 at six months (p< 0.001). Seventy-four percent of patients had greater than 50% back pain relief at six months. There were significant improvements in Oswestry disability score and sleep, and reductions in pain medication use. Adverse events observed were those seen with conventional SCS therapylead migration, wound infection, and pain around implant site. Conclusions In a cohort of patients with difficult-to-treat chronic back pain, high-frequency SCS provided significant and sustained low back pain and leg pain relief to more than 70% of treated subjects. Notably, this was achieved without paresthesia. Patients also experienced significant improvement in disability and sleep. Overall, the results confirm a favorable safety and efficacy profile of the high-frequency SCS system.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low- and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation and arterial blood pressure in patients with chronic pain and hypertension: a retrospective study
    Memar, Kimia
    Varghese, Sunita N.
    Morrison, Austin G.
    Clonch, Davina A.
    Lam, Christopher M.
    Holwerda, Seth W.
    CLINICAL AUTONOMIC RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (04) : 443 - 449
  • [22] Low- and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation and arterial blood pressure in patients with chronic pain and hypertension: a retrospective study
    Kimia Memar
    Sunita N. Varghese
    Austin G. Morrison
    Davina A. Clonch
    Christopher M. Lam
    Seth W. Holwerda
    Clinical Autonomic Research, 2023, 33 : 443 - 449
  • [23] High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Amirdelfan, Kasra
    Hong, Mindy
    Tay, Bobby
    Reddy, Surekha
    Reddy, Vinay
    Yang, Michael
    Khanna, Krishn
    Shirvalkar, Prasad
    Abrecht, Christopher
    Gulati, Amitabh
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 2991 - 2999
  • [24] Options: A Prospective, Open-Label Study of High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Back and Leg Pain
    Benyamin, Ramsin
    Galan, Vincent
    Hatheway, John
    Kim, Philip
    Choi, Daniel
    Falowski, Steven
    Calodney, Aaron
    Sweet, Jennifer
    Yu, Cong
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Provenzano, David
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2020, 23 (01) : 87 - 98
  • [25] Durable responses at 24 months with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for nonsurgical refractory back pain
    Patel, Naresh P.
    Jameson, Jessica
    Johnson, Curtis
    Kloster, Daniel
    Calodney, Aaron
    Kosek, Peter
    Pilitsis, Julie
    Bendel, Markus
    Petersen, Erika
    Wu, Chengyuan
    Cherry, Taissa
    Lad, Shivanand
    Yu, Cong
    Sayed, Dawood
    Goree, Johnathan
    Lyons, Mark K.
    Sack, Andrew
    Bruce, Diana
    Bharara, Manish
    Province-Azalde, Rose
    Caraway, David
    Kapural, Leonardo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2024, 40 (02) : 229 - 239
  • [26] Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Yu, Cong
    Doust, Matthew W.
    Gliner, Bradford E.
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Sitzman, B. Todd
    Amirdelfan, Kasra
    Morgan, Donna M.
    Yearwood, Thomas L.
    Bundschu, Richard
    Yang, Thomas
    Benyamin, Ramsin
    Burgher, Abram H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (05) : 667 - 676
  • [27] High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Pre-Clinical Overview and Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
    Bicket, Mark C.
    Dunn, Roger Y.
    Ahmed, Shihab U.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (12) : 2326 - 2336
  • [28] High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant low back pain-single-center experience
    Motov, Stefan
    Aftahy, Kaywan
    Joerger, Ann-Kathrin
    Wagner, Arthur
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Shiban, Ehab
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (05) : 2809 - 2818
  • [29] High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant low back pain—single-center experience
    Stefan Motov
    Kaywan Aftahy
    Ann-Kathrin Jörger
    Arthur Wagner
    Bernhard Meyer
    Ehab Shiban
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 2809 - 2818
  • [30] Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial COMMENTS
    Rubino, Sebastian
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    Mogilner, Alon Y.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (05) : 676 - 677