Opening the black box of trust: reasoning about trust models in a BDI agent

被引:14
|
作者
Koster, Andrew [1 ]
Schorlemmer, Marco [1 ]
Sabater-Mir, Jordi
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Artificial Intelligence Res Inst IIIA CSIC, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
Trust; BDI; multi-context systems; REPUTATION; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1093/logcom/exs003
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Trust models as thus far described in the literature can be seen as a monolithic structure: a trust model is provided with a variety of inputs and the model performs calculations, resulting in a trust evaluation as output. The agent has no direct method of adapting its trust model to its needs in a given context. In this article, we propose a first step in allowing an agent to reason about its trust model, by providing a method for incorporating a computational trust model into the cognitive architecture of the agent. By reasoning about the factors that influence the trust calculation the agent can effect changes in the computational process, thus proactively adapting its trust model. We give a declarative formalization of this system using a multi-context system and we show that three contemporary trust models, BRS, ReGReT and ForTrust can be incorporated into a BDI reasoning system using our framework.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 58
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reasoning about dynamics of trust and agent beliefs
    Orgun, Mehmet A.
    Liu, Chuchang
    [J]. IRI 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION, 2006, : 105 - +
  • [2] Dynamic agent-oriented reasoning about belief and trust
    Ustymenko, Stanislav
    Schwartz, Daniel G.
    [J]. MULTIAGENT AND GRID SYSTEMS, 2008, 4 (03) : 335 - 346
  • [3] A BDI agent architecture for reasoning about reputation
    Carbo, J
    Molina, JM
    Davila, J
    [J]. 2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5: E-SYSTEMS AND E-MAN FOR CYBERNETICS IN CYBERSPACE, 2002, : 817 - 822
  • [4] Reasoning About Belief, Evidence and Trust in a Multi-agent Setting
    Liu, Fenrong
    Lorini, Emiliano
    [J]. PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS (PRIMA 2017), 2017, 10621 : 71 - 89
  • [5] Advanced Trust Region Optimization Strategies for Glass Box/Black Box Models
    Eason, John P.
    Biegler, Lorenz T.
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2018, 64 (11) : 3934 - 3943
  • [6] Argument schemes for reasoning about trust
    Parsons, Simon
    Atkinson, Katie
    Li, Zimi
    McBurney, Peter
    Sklar, Elizabeth
    Singh, Munindar
    Haigh, Karen
    Levitt, Karl
    Rowe, Jeff
    [J]. ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION, 2014, 5 (2-3) : 160 - 190
  • [7] Argument Schemes for Reasoning about Trust
    Parsons, Simon
    Atkinson, Katie
    Haigh, Karen
    Levitt, Karl
    McBurney, Peter
    Rowe, Jeff
    Singh, Munindar P.
    Sklar, Elizabeth
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2012, 245 : 430 - +
  • [8] Can we trust the black box?
    Aldwinckle, Robin J.
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (05) : 338 - 338
  • [9] Trust Mass, Volume and Density - a Novel Approach to Reasoning about Trust
    Degerlund, Fredrik
    [J]. ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2007, 179 : 87 - 96
  • [10] A Study on Trust in Black Box Models and Post-hoc Explanations
    El Bekri, Nadia
    Kling, Jasmin
    Huber, Marco F.
    [J]. 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING MODELS IN INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS (SOCO 2019), 2020, 950 : 35 - 46