Argument Schemes for Reasoning about Trust

被引：14

作者：

Parsons, Simon ^{[1
,2
]}

Atkinson, Katie ^{[3
]}

Haigh, Karen ^{[4
]}

Levitt, Karl ^{[5
]}

McBurney, Peter ^{[6
]}

Rowe, Jeff ^{[5
]}

Singh, Munindar P. ^{[7
]}

Sklar, Elizabeth ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] CUNY Brooklyn Coll, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA

[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA

[3] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England

[4] Raytheon BBN Technol, Cambridge, MA USA

[5] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA

[6] Kings Coll London, London WC2B 5RL, England

[7] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA

来源：

COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT | 2012年 / 245卷

关键词：

Argument schemes; critical questions; trust;

D O I：

10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-430

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

Trust is a natural mechanism by which an autonomous party can deal with the inherent uncertainty regarding the behaviors of other parties and the uncertainty in the information it shares with those parties. Trust is thus crucial in any decentralized system. We build on recent efforts to use argumentation to reason about trust. Specifically, we provide a set of schemes, abstract patterns of reasoning that apply in multiple situations, geared toward trust. We describe, in the form of a set of critical questions, the situations in which the schemes may default.

引用

页码：430 / +

页数：2

共 50 条

[1] Argument schemes for reasoning about trust
Parsons, Simon
Atkinson, Katie
Li, Zimi
McBurney, Peter
Sklar, Elizabeth
Singh, Munindar
Haigh, Karen
Levitt, Karl
Rowe, Jeff
[J]. ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION, 2014, 5 (2-3) : 160 - 190
[2] Argument Schemes for Reasoning About the Actions of Others
Atkinson, Katie
Bench-Capon, Trevor
[J]. COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2016, 287 : 71 - 82
[3] Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law
Bench-Capon, Trevor
Prakken, Henry
[J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2010, 18 (02) : 153 - 174
[4] How to Disagree About Argument Schemes
Shecaira, Fabio Perin
[J]. INFORMAL LOGIC, 2016, 36 (04): : 500 - 522
[5] Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning
Wyner, Adam
Bench-Capon, Trevor
[J]. LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 165 : 139 - 149
[6] Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions
Atkinson, Katie
Bench-Capon, Trevor
Prakken, Henry
Wyner, Adam
[J]. LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 259 : 39 - 48
[7] Reasoning about (Negative) Trust under Uncertainty
Doneda, Francesca
Genco, Francesco A.
Primiero, Giuseppe
[J]. TWENTY YEARS OF THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL SYNERGIES, CIE 2024, 2024, 14773 : XXX - XXX
[8] Reasoning about Trust and Time in a System of Agents
Drawel, Nagat
Bentahar, Jamal
Shakshuki, Elhadi
[J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT-2017) AND THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT 2017), 2017, 109 : 632 - 639
[9] An axiomatic basis for reasoning about trust in PKIs
Liu, CC
Ozols, M
Cant, T
[J]. INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 2119 : 274 - 291
[10] Reasoning about dynamics of trust and agent beliefs
Orgun, Mehmet A.
Liu, Chuchang
[J]. IRI 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION, 2006, : 105 - +

← 1 2 3 4 5 →