Examination and analysis of implementation choices within the Material Point Method (MPM)

被引:0
|
作者
Steffen, M. [2 ]
Wallstedt, P. C. [1 ]
Guilkey, J. E. [1 ]
Kirby, R. M. [2 ]
Berzins, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Mech Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Comp, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
来源
关键词
Material Point Method; GIMP; meshfree methods; meshless methods; particle methods; smoothed particle hydrodynamics; quadrature;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Material Point Method (MPM) has shown itself to be a powerful tool in the stimulation of large deformation problems, especially those involving complex geometries and contact where typical finite element type methods frequently fail. While these large complex problems lead to some impressive simulations and solutions, there has been a lack of basic analysis characterizing the errors present in the method, even on the simplest of problems. The large number of choices one has when implementing, the method, Such as the choice of basis functions and boundary treatments, further complicates this error analysis. In this paper we explore some of the many choices one can make when implementing an MPM algorithm and the numerical ramifications of these choices. Specifically, we analyze and demonstrate how the smoothing length within the Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method (GIMP) can affect the error and stability properties of the method. We also demonstrate flow various choices of basis functions and boundary treatments affect the spatial convergence properties of MPM.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 127
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Material point method for dynamic analysis of saturated porous media (III): two-phase material point method
    Zhang, Hong-Wu
    Wang, Kun-Peng
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32 (04): : 507 - 513
  • [42] Validation of material point method for soil fluidisation analysis
    Bolognin, Marco
    Martinelli, Mario
    Bakker, Klaas J.
    Jonkman, Sebastiaan N.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2017, 29 (03) : 431 - 437
  • [43] Analysis of spatial interpolation in the material-point method
    Andersen, S.
    Andersen, L.
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2010, 88 (7-8) : 506 - 518
  • [44] Validation of material point method for soil fluidisation analysis
    Marco Bolognin
    Mario Martinelli
    Klaas J. Bakker
    Sebastiaan N. Jonkman
    Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29 : 431 - 437
  • [45] Runout analysis of landslides using material point method
    Sun, Y.
    Yang, J.
    Song, E.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GEOHAZARDS AND GEOMECHANICS (ISGG2015), 2015, 26
  • [46] Validation of material point method for soil fluidisation analysis
    Marco Bolognin
    Mario Martinelli
    Klaas J.Bakker
    Sebastiaan N.Jonkman
    JournalofHydrodynamics, 2017, 29 (03) : 431 - 437
  • [47] Validation of material point method for soil fluidisation analysis
    Bolognin, Marco
    Martinelli, Mario
    Bakker, Klaas J.
    Jonkman, Sebastiaan N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE MATERIAL POINT METHOD (MPM 2017), 2017, 175 : 233 - 241
  • [48] Modelling of full-scale silo experiments with flow correcting inserts using material point method (MPM) based on hypoplasticity
    Krzyzanowski, J.
    Tejchman, J.
    Wojcik, M.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 392 : 375 - 392
  • [49] Modelling large deformation and soil-water-structure interaction with material point method: Briefing on MPM2017 conference
    Rohe, Alexander
    Liang, Dongfang
    JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2017, 29 (03) : 393 - 396
  • [50] An assessment of the total Lagrangian material point method: Comparison to conventional MPM, higher order basis, and treatment of near-incompressibility
    Telikicherla, Ram Mohan
    Moutsanidis, Georgios
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 414