Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production

被引:189
|
作者
Kaab, Ali [1 ]
Sharifi, Mohammad [1 ]
Mobli, Hossein [1 ]
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan [1 ,2 ]
Chau, Kwok-wing [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Dept Agr Machinery Engn, Karaj, Iran
[2] Management Fruit & Vegetables Org, Tehran, Iran
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Energy; Life cycle assessment; Modeling; Sugarcane; INPUT-OUTPUT; CROPPING SYSTEMS; SOLAR-RADIATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; ANFIS; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aims to employ two artificial intelligence (AI) methods, namely, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model, for predicting life cycle environmental impacts and output energy of sugarcane production in planter] or racoon farms. The study is performed in Imam Khomeini Sugarcane Ago-Industrial Company (IKSAIC) in Khuzeslan province of Iran. Based on the cradle Lo grave approach, life cycle assessment (LCA) is employed lo evaluate environmental impacts and study environmental impact categories of sugarcane production. Results of this study show that the consumed and output energies of sugarcane production are in average 172,856.14 MJ ha(-1), 120,000 MJ ha(-1) in planted farms and 122,801.15 MJ ha(-1),98,850 MJ ha in racoon farms, respectively. Results show that, in sugarcane production, electricity, machinery, biocides and sugarcane stem cuttings have the largest impact on the indices in planted farms. However, in racoon farms, electricity, machinery, biocides and nitrogen fertilizers have the largest share in increasing the indices. ANN model with 9 10 5 11 and 7 9 6 11 structures are the best topologies for predicting environmental impacts and output energy of sugarcane production in planted and ratoon farms, respectively. Results from ANN models indicated that the coefficient of determination (R2) varies from 0.923 to 0.986 in planted farms and 0.942 to 0.982 in ratoon farms in training stage for environmental impacts and outpt energy. Results from ANFIS model, which is developed based on a hybrid learning algorithm, showed that, for prediction of environmental impacts, R2 varies from 0.912 to 0.978 and 0.986 to 0.999 in plant and ratoon farms, respectively, and for prediction of output
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1019
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental impacts of cocoa production and processing in Ghana: life cycle assessment approach
    Ntiamoah, Augustine
    Afrane, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (16) : 1735 - 1740
  • [22] Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Khojastehpour, Mehdi
    Emadi, Bagher
    Taheri-Rad, Alireza
    Khorramdel, Surur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 84 - 90
  • [23] EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FRUIT PRODUCTION USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
    Butcaru, Ana Cornelia
    Catuneanu, Ioana Laura
    Stanica, Florin
    Badulescu, Liliana
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2021, 65 (02): : 11 - 18
  • [24] Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems
    Taki, Morteza
    Soheili-Fard, Farshad
    Rohani, Abbas
    Chen, Guangnan
    Yildizhan, Hasan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 195 - 207
  • [25] Assessing the environmental impacts of copper cathode production based on life cycle assessment
    Shahraki, Hamed
    Einollahipeer, Fatemeh
    Abyar, Hajar
    Erfani, Malihe
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 (04) : 1180 - 1190
  • [26] Use of life cycle assessment to characterize the environmental impacts of polyol production options
    Helling, Richard K.
    Russell, David A.
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2009, 11 (03) : 380 - 389
  • [27] Environmental impact and energy balance assessment in ethanol production from sugarcane molasses: A life cycle analysis in southern India
    Uppalapati, Sudhakar
    Jani, S. P.
    Raj, J. Bensam
    Rajaganapathy, C.
    Murugapoopathi, S.
    Shangdiar, Sumarlin
    Amesho, Kassian T. T.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 204
  • [28] Life Cycle Water Use of Energy Production and Its Environmental Impacts in China
    Zhang, Chao
    Anadon, Laura Diaz
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (24) : 14459 - 14467
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and energy demand for capacitive deionization technology
    Yu, Ting-Hua
    Shiu, Huan-Yu
    Lee, Mengshan
    Chiueh, Pei-Te
    Hou, Chia-Hung
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2016, 399 : 53 - 60
  • [30] Energy Production from Natural Gas: Evaluation of Potential Environmental Impacts using Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Hafizan, C.
    Noor, Z. Z.
    Michael, F. L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2014, 864-867 : 1132 - 1138