Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production

被引:189
|
作者
Kaab, Ali [1 ]
Sharifi, Mohammad [1 ]
Mobli, Hossein [1 ]
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan [1 ,2 ]
Chau, Kwok-wing [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Dept Agr Machinery Engn, Karaj, Iran
[2] Management Fruit & Vegetables Org, Tehran, Iran
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Energy; Life cycle assessment; Modeling; Sugarcane; INPUT-OUTPUT; CROPPING SYSTEMS; SOLAR-RADIATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; ANFIS; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aims to employ two artificial intelligence (AI) methods, namely, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model, for predicting life cycle environmental impacts and output energy of sugarcane production in planter] or racoon farms. The study is performed in Imam Khomeini Sugarcane Ago-Industrial Company (IKSAIC) in Khuzeslan province of Iran. Based on the cradle Lo grave approach, life cycle assessment (LCA) is employed lo evaluate environmental impacts and study environmental impact categories of sugarcane production. Results of this study show that the consumed and output energies of sugarcane production are in average 172,856.14 MJ ha(-1), 120,000 MJ ha(-1) in planted farms and 122,801.15 MJ ha(-1),98,850 MJ ha in racoon farms, respectively. Results show that, in sugarcane production, electricity, machinery, biocides and sugarcane stem cuttings have the largest impact on the indices in planted farms. However, in racoon farms, electricity, machinery, biocides and nitrogen fertilizers have the largest share in increasing the indices. ANN model with 9 10 5 11 and 7 9 6 11 structures are the best topologies for predicting environmental impacts and output energy of sugarcane production in planted and ratoon farms, respectively. Results from ANN models indicated that the coefficient of determination (R2) varies from 0.923 to 0.986 in planted farms and 0.942 to 0.982 in ratoon farms in training stage for environmental impacts and outpt energy. Results from ANFIS model, which is developed based on a hybrid learning algorithm, showed that, for prediction of environmental impacts, R2 varies from 0.912 to 0.978 and 0.986 to 0.999 in plant and ratoon farms, respectively, and for prediction of output
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1019
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid
    Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 631-632 : 1279 - 1294
  • [2] The effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
    Javier Sáez-Guinoa
    Enrique García-Franco
    Eva Llera-Sastresa
    Luis M. Romeo
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 380 - 393
  • [3] The effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
    Saez-Guinoa, Javier
    Garcia-Franco, Enrique
    Llera-Sastresa, Eva
    Romeo, Luis M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (03): : 380 - 393
  • [4] Life cycle environmental impacts of bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses in Iran
    Farahani, Saeid Shahvarooghi
    Asoodar, Mohammad Amin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (28) : 22547 - 22556
  • [5] Life cycle environmental impacts of bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses in Iran
    Saeid Shahvarooghi Farahani
    Mohammad Amin Asoodar
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24 : 22547 - 22556
  • [6] Life cycle energy and environmental impacts in sugarcane production: A case study of Amirkabir Sugarcane Agro-Industrial Company in Khuzestan province
    Nejad, Mansour Sadouni
    Almassi, Morteza
    Ghahderijani, Mohammad
    [J]. RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 20
  • [7] Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production
    Kaab, Ali
    Sharifi, Mohammad
    Mobli, Hossein
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 181 : 1298 - 1320
  • [8] Environmental life cycle assessment and social impacts of bioethanol production in Thailand
    Papong, Seksan
    Rewlay-ngoen, Chantima
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    Malakul, Pomthong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 254 - 266
  • [9] Perovskite photovoltaics: life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts
    Gong, Jian
    Darling, Seth B.
    You, Fengqi
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (07) : 1953 - 1968
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: Environmental impacts and energy balance
    Morales, Marjorie
    Quintero, Julian
    Conejeros, Raul
    Aroca, German
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 : 1349 - 1361