Economic value of traffic noise reduction depending on residents' annoyance level

被引:17
|
作者
Kim, Kyungah [1 ]
Shin, Jungwoo [2 ]
Oh, Myoungjin [2 ]
Jung, Jung-Kyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Engn, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn, 1732 Deogyeong Daero, Yongin 17104, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] KISTEP, Off R&D Budget & Feasibil Anal, 60 Mabang Ro, Seoul 06775, South Korea
关键词
Annoyance level; Contingent valuation method; Economic value; Traffic noise; CONTINGENT VALUATION; EXPOSURE; DISEASE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-019-04186-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Noise is the most frequently encountered type of environmental pollution in everyday life and has a direct negative effect on humans. Individuals who are constantly exposed to noise tend to have a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and hypertension. Noise sources range from construction sites to political rallies and assemblies, but traffic is one of the most long-lasting and chronic sources of noise. Previously, researchers have conducted valuations of road traffic noise reduction, but they did not consider residents' annoyance levels in response to traffic noise. However, individuals' annoyance levels affect the economic value of noise reduction policies and thus must be considered to obtain an accurate estimate. Therefore, this study investigated residents' willingness to pay for traffic noise reduction depending on their annoyance level. We used the contingent valuation method and a survey to analyze how much 1022 respondents in Korea were willing to pay for noise reduction. We found that people who were annoyed and extremely annoyed by noise had a willingness to pay KRW 8422 (US $7.55) and KRW 9848 (US $8.83) annually per household, respectively, to reduce their annoyance level to zero. In addition, we determined the economic benefits of noise reduction policies using the respondents' willingness to pay to reduce noise by 1dB(A), which totaled KRW 3.28 billion (US $2.91 million) per year. The results of this study provide estimates of the annual benefits of traffic noise reduction considering residents' annoyance level.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:7243 / 7255
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Noise Annoyance from Tram Traffic in the Urban Environment
    Panulinova, Eva
    Harabinova, Slavka
    CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (02) : 688 - 694
  • [42] Traffic noise: More than just mere annoyance?
    Quraishy, Maryam Saida
    Dar, Arifa
    Narejo, Savera
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 73 (10) : 2136 - 2136
  • [43] Linking Traffic Noise, Noise Annoyance and Life Satisfaction: A Case Study
    Urban, Jan
    Maca, Vojtech
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (05) : 1895 - 1915
  • [44] LABORATORY STUDY OF ANNOYANCE DUE TO TRAFFIC NOISE AND CHOICE OF NOISE DESCRIPTORS
    ANDREW, C
    MAY, DN
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1977, 62 : S95 - S95
  • [45] Road traffic noise annoyance and window orientation in dwellings
    Rylander, R
    Björkman, M
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2002, 249 (04) : 828 - 831
  • [46] Noise annoyance through railway traffic - a case study
    Trombetta Zannin, Paulo Henrique
    Bunn, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 12
  • [47] How Does Noise Annoyance Relate to Traffic Intensity?
    Jerson, T.
    Ogren, M.
    Ohrstrom, E.
    Gunnarsson, A. Gidlof
    NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION FOR RAIL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 118 : 323 - +
  • [48] THE DIFFERING ANNOYANCE LEVELS OF RAIL AND ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE
    KNALL, V
    SCHUEMER, R
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1983, 87 (02) : 321 - 326
  • [50] NOISE SENSITIVITY AND ANNOYANCE CAUSED BY TRAFFIC NOISE IN PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING
    PETERSON, Y
    ANIANSSON, G
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1988, 127 (03) : 543 - 548