Comparison of genetic algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms in course scheduling

被引:6
|
作者
Ramdania, D. R. [1 ]
Irfan, M. [1 ]
Alfarisi, F. [1 ]
Nuraiman, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Informat Engn, Bandung, Indonesia
[2] Univ Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Math, Bandung, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/1402/2/022079
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Making lecture schedules is a complicated matter because it involves many parties and resources. In order to arrange the schedule optimally, a method is needed that can produce the best optimization value. In this paper, we will discuss the comparison of Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization to design lecture schedules. Once implemented, then comparative analysis of the results of the course scheduling process is carried out by comparing the fitness value and execution speed of the two algorithms. The results showed that in the 25th iteration the Genetic algorithm succeeded in compiling a lecture schedule with the best fitness value of 0.021 and 9.36 second execution time compared to the PSO algorithm which produced a fitness value of 0.099 and execution time of 61.95 seconds in the same iteration. This proves that the PSO fitness value outperforms the Genetic Algorithm, but the Genetic Algorithm execution time is faster than the PSO algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison and application of four versions of particle swarm optimization algorithms in the sequence optimization
    Zhang, Wei-Bo
    Zhu, Guang-Yu
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (07) : 8858 - 8864
  • [32] Comparison among three kinds of hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithms
    Zhang, Handong
    Fang, Ling
    Cen, Yuwan
    [J]. 2011 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2011, : 3422 - 3425
  • [33] Comparison of particle swarm optimization and backpropagation as training algorithms for neural networks
    Gudise, VG
    Venayagamoorthy, GK
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 IEEE SWARM INTELLIGENCE SYMPOSIUM (SIS 03), 2003, : 110 - 117
  • [34] Development of Hybrid Artificial Neural Network-Particle Swarm Optimization Model and Comparison of Genetic and Particle Swarm Algorithms for Optimization of Machining Fixture Layout
    Ramesh, M.
    Sundararaman, K. A.
    Sabareeswaran, M.
    Srinivasan, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, 2022, 23 (12) : 1411 - 1430
  • [35] Improved particle swarm optimization algorithms for electromagnetic optimization
    Mussetta, Marco
    Selleri, Stefano
    Pirinoli, Paola
    Zich, Riccardo E.
    Matekovits, Ladislau
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2008, 19 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [36] Flexibility in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Using Particle Swarm Algorithms and Genetic Algorithms
    El Hamzaoui, Youness
    Bassam, Ali
    Abatal, Mohamed
    Rodriguez, Jose A.
    Duarte-Villasenor, Miguel A.
    Escobedo, Lizbeth
    Puga, Sergio A.
    [J]. NEO 2015, 2017, 663 : 149 - 171
  • [37] Optimization of an analog controller for a solar tracker using genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization
    Espitia Cuchango, Helbert Eduardo
    Sierra Vargas, Fabio Emiro
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES AND ENERGY QUALITY (SIFAE), 2012,
  • [38] Optimization of Greenhouse Climate Model Parameters Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithms
    Hasni, Abdelhafid
    Taibi, Rachid
    Draoui, Belkacem
    Boulard, Thierry
    [J]. IMPACT OF INTEGRATED CLEAN ENERGY ON THE FUTURE OF THE MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 6 : 371 - 380
  • [39] Headless Chicken Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms
    Grobler, Jacomine
    Engelbrecht, Andries P.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SWARM INTELLIGENCE, ICSI 2016, PT I, 2016, 9712 : 350 - 357
  • [40] A Survey on Parallel Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms
    Lalwani, Soniya
    Sharma, Harish
    Satapathy, Suresh Chandra
    Deep, Kusum
    Bansal, Jagdish Chand
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 44 (04) : 2899 - 2923