Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance

被引:34
|
作者
Kramer, Daniel B. [1 ]
Baker, Matthew [1 ]
Ransford, Benjamin [2 ]
Molina-Markham, Andres [2 ]
Stewart, Quinn [2 ]
Fu, Kevin [2 ]
Reynolds, Matthew R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Comp Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DEFIBRILLATORS; RECALLS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0040200
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Medical devices increasingly depend on computing functions such as wireless communication and Internet connectivity for software-based control of therapies and network-based transmission of patients' stored medical information. These computing capabilities introduce security and privacy risks, yet little is known about the prevalence of such risks within the clinical setting. Methods: We used three comprehensive, publicly available databases maintained by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate recalls and adverse events related to security and privacy risks of medical devices. Results: Review of weekly enforcement reports identified 1,845 recalls; 605 (32.8%) of these included computers, 35 (1.9%) stored patient data, and 31 (1.7%) were capable of wireless communication. Searches of databases specific to recalls and adverse events identified only one event with a specific connection to security or privacy. Software-related recalls were relatively common, and most (81.8%) mentioned the possibility of upgrades, though only half of these provided specific instructions for the update mechanism. Conclusions: Our review of recalls and adverse events from federal government databases reveals sharp inconsistencies with databases at individual providers with respect to security and privacy risks. Recalls related to software may increase security risks because of unprotected update and correction mechanisms. To detect signals of security and privacy problems that adversely affect public health, federal postmarket surveillance strategies should rethink how to effectively and efficiently collect data on security and privacy problems in devices that increasingly depend on computing systems susceptible to malware.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Privacy and security of medical information
    Jobes, KE
    White, ER
    Antonelli, PJ
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 35 (06) : 1203 - +
  • [42] Descriptive analysis of postmarket surveillance data for hip implants
    Pane, Josep
    Verhamme, Katia M. C.
    Rebollo, Irene
    Sturkenboom, Miriam C. J. M.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 (04) : 380 - 387
  • [43] Postmarket surveillance and returned product analysis: Success but not transparency
    Piccini, Jonathan P., Sr.
    Califf, Robert M.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2013, 10 (10) : 1469 - 1470
  • [44] Neurosecurity: security and privacy for neural devices
    Denning, Tamara
    Matsuoka, Yoky
    Kohno, Tadayoshi
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (01)
  • [45] THE IMPACT OF FDA REGULATIONS ON MEDICAL DEVICES
    TAYLOR, EF
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1980, (NSYM): : 8 - 10
  • [46] FDA: CT and Electronic Medical Devices
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (06) : 16N - 16N
  • [47] HOW THE FDA REGULATES MEDICAL DEVICES
    HAYES, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 1983, 8 (05): : 597 - 600
  • [48] FDA warns on DEHP in medical devices
    不详
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2002, 80 (29) : 28 - 28
  • [49] Discussion of FDA regulation of medical devices
    Pennington, DG
    Burlington, DB
    Copeland, JG
    Flannery, EJ
    Hill, JD
    Olsen, D
    Tandy, MK
    Jarvik, RK
    Griffith, BP
    Magovern, GJ
    Long, J
    Zuckerman, B
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 61 (01): : 493 - 498
  • [50] Cosmetic medical devices and their FDA regulation
    Newburger, AE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 142 (02) : 225 - 228