YAG Laser Treatment for Epithelial Ingrowth in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Interface

被引:3
|
作者
Jenkins, Sabrina G. [1 ]
Jun, Albert S. [1 ]
Woreta, Fasika A. [1 ]
Srikumaran, Divya [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Wilmer Eye Inst, Sch Med, 600 North Wolfe St,Wilmer B-31, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
epithelial ingrowth; DMEK; Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; YAG laser;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000002367
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present a case of epithelial ingrowth in the graft-host interface after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery that was successfully treated with a yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser. Methods: A 53-year-old white woman underwent uncomplicated combined cataract and DMEK surgery in her right eye. At her regularly scheduled 6-month follow-up visit, an asymptomatic dense white interface opacity was observed. Confocal imaging confirmed the presence of epithelial cells. After initial close observation, the opacity was noted to be slowly growing and the patient underwent YAG laser treatment for the opacity. Results: The patient remained stable 4 months postlaser treatment with no recurrence of epithelial ingrowth. Conclusions: YAG laser treatment may be a safe and effective way to treat early-stage epithelial ingrowth in the interface after DMEK surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1441
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Children
    Pereira, Nicolas Cesario
    Pereira Gomes, Jose Alvaro
    Tonin, Camile
    Verardo, Fabiana Orondjian
    Felippe, Rodolpho Sueiro
    Forseto, Adriana dos Santos
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (04) : 453 - 457
  • [42] Efficacy of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Dirisamer, Martin
    Ham, Lisanne
    Dapena, Isabel
    Moutsouris, Kyros
    Droutsas, Konstantinos
    van Dijk, Korine
    Frank, Laurence E.
    Oellerich, Silke
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 129 (11) : 1435 - 1443
  • [43] Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty for Epithelial Ingrowth
    Bagga, Bhupesh
    Rao, Sridhar
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 125 (05) : 734 - 734
  • [44] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty to Treat Graft Failure after Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Oh, Si Eun
    Ha, Min Ji
    Whang, Woong Joo
    Byun, Yong-Soo
    Hwang, Hyung Bin
    Na, Kyung Sun
    Rho, Chang Rae
    Lee, Hyun Soo
    Chung, So-Hyang
    Kim, Eun Chul
    Cho, Yang Kyung
    Kim, Hyun Seung
    Kim, Man Soo
    Hwang, Ho Sik
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (12): : 1532 - 1537
  • [45] Secondary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Failed Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Clinical Results
    Yoeruek, Efdal
    Bartz-Schmidt, Karl-Ulrich
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (11) : 1414 - 1417
  • [46] Endothelial keratoplasty: is Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty the way forward? Yes
    Liarakos, V. S.
    Tsatsos, M.
    Satue, M.
    Melles, G. R. J.
    EYE, 2017, 31 (09) : 1329 - 1332
  • [47] Endothelial keratoplasty: is Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty the way forward? Yes
    V S Liarakos
    M Tsatsos
    M Satue
    G R J Melles
    Eye, 2017, 31 : 1329 - 1332
  • [48] Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty at a Referral Center for Keratoplasty in Spain: DIMOEK Study
    Moura-Coelho, Nuno
    Manero, Felicidad
    Elies, Daniel
    Amich, Nicolas
    Morral, Merce
    Gris, Oscar
    Guell, Jose
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 215 : 49 - 55
  • [49] Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
    Viberg, Andreas
    Samolov, Branka
    Bystroem, Berit
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 130 (12) : 1248 - 1257
  • [50] Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis
    Leru Zhu
    Yi Zha
    Jianqiu Cai
    Yanling Zhang
    International Ophthalmology, 2018, 38 : 897 - 905