New model of reactive transport in a single-well push-pull test with aquitard effect and wellbore storage

被引:10
|
作者
Wang, Quanrong [1 ]
Wang, Junxia [2 ]
Zhan, Hongbin [3 ]
Shi, Wenguang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Math & Phys, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
SOLUTE TRANSPORT; RADIAL DISPERSION; TRACER TEST; AQUIFER; FLOW; RETARDATION; GROUNDWATER; DIFFUSION; BOUNDARY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.5194/hess-24-3983-2020
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The model of single-well push-pull (SWPP) test has been widely used to investigate reactive radial dispersion in remediation or parameter estimation of in situ aquifers. Previous analytical solutions only focused on a completely isolated aquifer for the SWPP test, excluding any influence of aquitards bounding the tested aquifer, and ignored the wellbore storage of the chaser and rest phases in the SWPP test. Such simplification might be questionable in field applications when test durations are relatively long because solute transport in or out of the bounding aquitards is inevitable due to molecular diffusion and cross-formational advective transport. Here, a new SWPP model is developed in an aquifer-aquitard system with wellbore storage, and the analytical solution in the Laplace domain is derived. Four phases of the test are included: the injection phase, the chaser phase, the rest phase and the extraction phase. As the permeability of the aquitard is much smaller than the permeability of the aquifer, the flow is assumed to be perpendicular to the aquitard; thus only vertical dispersive and advective transports are considered for the aquitard. The validity of this treatment is tested against results grounded in numerical simulations. The global sensitivity analysis indicates that the results of the SWPP test are largely sensitive (i.e., influenced by) to the parameters of porosity and radial dispersion of the aquifer, whereas the influence of the aquitard on results could not be ignored. In the injection phase, the larger radial dispersivity of the aquifer could result in the smaller values of breakthrough curves (BTCs), while there are greater BTC values in the chaser and rest phases. In the extraction phase, it could lead to the smaller peak values of BTCs. The new model of this study is a generalization of several previous studies, and it performs better than previous studies ignoring the aquitard effect and wellbore storage for interpreting data of the field SWPP test reported by Yang et al. (2014).
引用
收藏
页码:3983 / 4000
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Single-well push-pull tests evaluating isobutane as a primary substrate for promoting in situ cometabolic biotransformation reactions
    Rolston, Hannah
    Hyman, Michael
    Semprini, Lewis
    BIODEGRADATION, 2022, 33 (04) : 349 - 371
  • [32] Fractional Models Simulating Non-Fickian Behavior in Four-Stage Single-Well Push-Pull Tests
    Chen, Kewei
    Zhan, Hongbin
    Yang, Qiang
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (11) : 9528 - 9545
  • [33] Evaluating surfactant-enhanced nonaqueous phase (DNAPL) recovery using single-well "push-pull" tests.
    Field, JA
    Istok, JD
    Schroth, M
    Sawyer, TE
    Humphrey, MD
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 218 : U1040 - U1040
  • [34] Assessing the activity and diversity of fumarate-fed denitrifying bacteria by performing field single-well push-pull tests
    Kim, Jin-Hoon
    Ha, Chul-Yoon
    Oa, Seong-Wook
    Lee, Jin-Woo
    Park, Sun-Hwa
    Kwon, Soo-Youl
    Kim, Sungpyo
    Kim, Young
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 46 (01): : 33 - 41
  • [35] Single-well push-pull test for assessing potential impacts of CO2 leakage on groundwater quality in a shallow Gulf Coast aquifer in Cranfield, Mississippi
    Yang, Changbing
    Mickler, Patrick J.
    Reedy, Robert
    Scanlon, Bridget R.
    Romanak, Katherine D.
    Nicot, Jean-Philippe
    Hovorka, Susan D.
    Trevino, Ramon H.
    Larson, Toti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 18 : 375 - 387
  • [36] Model analysis of CO2 residual trapping from single-well push pull test - Heletz, Residual Trapping Experiment II
    Joodaki, Saba
    Moghadasi, Ramin
    Basirat, Farzad
    Yang, Zhibing
    Bensabat, Jacob
    Niemi, Auli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2020, 101
  • [37] Estimating In Situ Biodegradation Rates of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Microbial Population Dynamics by Performing Single-Well Push-Pull Tests in a Fractured Bedrock Aquifer
    Cho, Yunchul
    Han, Kyungjin
    Kim, Namhee
    Park, Sunhwa
    Kim, Young
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2013, 224 (02):
  • [38] A single well push-pull test method for in situ determination of denitrification rates in a nitrate-contaminated groundwater aquifer
    Kim, Y
    Kim, JH
    Son, BH
    Oa, SW
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (08) : 77 - 86
  • [39] A new insight into the push-pull effect of substituents via the stilbene-like model compounds
    Cao, Chaotun
    Zeng, Zhao
    Cao, Chenzhong
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2022, 35 (04)
  • [40] Model analysis of CO2 residual trapping from single-well push pull test based on hydraulic withdrawal tests - Heletz, residual trapping experiment I
    Joodaki, Saba
    Yang, Zhibing
    Bensabat, Jacob
    Niemi, Auli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2020, 97