Overview of Tigecycline Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections - A European Perspective

被引:9
|
作者
Teras, J. [1 ]
Gardovskis, J. [2 ]
Vaasna, T. [3 ]
Kupcs, U. [4 ]
Pupelis, G. [5 ]
Dukart, G. [6 ]
Dartois, N. [7 ]
Jouve, S. [7 ]
Cooper, A. [6 ]
机构
[1] N Estonian Reg Hosp, Surg Clin, EE-13419 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Med Acad Latvia, P Stradins Clin Univ Hosp, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
[3] Tartu Univ Clin, Surg Clin, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia
[4] Valmiera Hosp, Dept Surg, LV-4201 Valmiera, Latvia
[5] Clin Hosp Gailezers, Dept Surg, LV-1038 Riga, Latvia
[6] Wyeth Res, Collegeville, PA USA
[7] Wyeth Res, F-92931 Paris, France
关键词
Complicated skin and skin structure infections; randomized study; tigecycline;
D O I
10.1179/joc.2008.20.Supplement-1.20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, multinational, controlled trial, 546 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections received tigecycline 100 mg/day (a 100-mg initial dose and then 50 mg intravenously twice daily) or the combination of vancomycin 2 g/day (1 g intravenously twice daily) and aztreonam 4 g/day (2 g intravenously twice daily) for up to 14 days. Three hundred eighty-five (385) were from Europe. The primary endpoint was the clinical response in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) and clinically evaluable populations at the test-of-cure visit 12 to 92 days after the last dose. The microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit was also assessed. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory results and adverse event reporting. Of the patients enrolled in Europe, 376 patients were included in the c-mITT population (tigecycline group, n = 189; vancomycin/aztreonam group, n = 187), and 326 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline group, n = 167; vancomycin/aztreonam group, n = 159). The clinical responses in the tigecycline and the vancomycin/aztreonam groups in the clinically evaluable population were 89.8% versus 95.0%. Microbiologic eradication (documented or presumed) occurred in 84.8% of the European patients receiving tigecycline and 93.2% of the European patients receiving vancomycin/aztreonam. The number of European patients reporting adverse events was similar in the two groups, with increased nausea and vomiting rates in the tigecycline group and an increased incidence of rash and increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the vancomycin/aztreonam group. Current data support findings from the overall results in the Phase 3 study and suggest that tigecycline is safe and effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 27
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antibiotic optimization in the difficult-to-treat patient with complicated intra-abdominal or complicated skin and skin structure infections: focus on tigecycline
    Reygaert, Wanda C.
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2010, 6 : 419 - 430
  • [32] Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
    Kimko, Holly
    Murthy, Bindu
    Xu, Xu
    Nandy, Partha
    Strauss, Richard
    Noel, Gary J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (03) : 1228 - 1230
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial
    Sacchidanand, S
    Penn, RL
    Embil, JM
    Campos, ME
    Curcio, D
    Ellis-Grosse, E
    Loh, E
    Rose, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 9 (05) : 251 - 261
  • [34] Safety and tolerability of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue and intra-abdominal infections: an analysis based on five European observational studies
    Guirao, Xavier
    Sanchez Garcia, Miguel
    Bassetti, Matteo
    Bodmann, Klaus Friedrich
    Dupont, Herve
    Montravers, Philippe
    Heizmann, Wolfgang R.
    Capparella, Maria Rita
    Simoneau, Damien
    Eckmann, Christian
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 68 : ii37 - ii44
  • [35] Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Cautionary Tale
    Salcido, Richard Sal''
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2012, 25 (03) : 104 - 104
  • [36] Ceftaroline for complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Nannini, Esteban C.
    Stryjewski, Martin E.
    Corey, G. Ralph
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 11 (07) : 1197 - 1206
  • [37] Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of GSK1322322 in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections
    Corey, Ralph
    Naderer, Odin J.
    O'Riordan, William D.
    Dumont, Etienne
    Jones, Lori S.
    Kurtinecz, Milena
    Zhu, John Z.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 58 (11) : 6518 - 6527
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam and cefuroxime in the treatment of serious skin and skin structure infections in pediatric patients
    Azimi, PH
    Barson, WJ
    Janner, D
    Swanson, R
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1999, 18 (07) : 609 - 613
  • [39] Efficacy of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in real-life clinical practice from five European observational studies
    Montravers, Philippe
    Bassetti, Matteo
    Dupont, Herve
    Eckmann, Christian
    Heizmann, Wolfgang R.
    Guirao, Xavier
    Sanchez Garcia, Miguel
    Capparella, Maria Rita
    Simoneau, Damien
    Bodmann, Klaus Friedrich
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 68 : ii15 - ii24
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and tigecycline for the empiric treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Alhifany, Abdullah A.
    Bifari, Nisrin
    Alatawi, Yasser
    Malik, Saad U.
    Almangour, Thamer A.
    Altebainawi, Ali F.
    Alshammari, Thamir M.
    Alotaibi, Amal F.
    Mahrous, Ahmad J.
    Alshehri, Fahad S.
    Cheema, Ejaz
    SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (03) : 195 - 204